Literature DB >> 8744970

Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.

R Ratcliff1, G McKoon.   

Abstract

According to compound-cue retrieval theories, responses in lexical decision are determined by a passive process that matches a compound of the items in short-term memory against all of the information in long-term memory. Because responses depend on other items in short-term memory in addition to the target item about which a lexical decision is required, compound-cue theories must predict sequential effects and priming effects. For example, a nonword preceding a target should slow responses to the target, and a prime word related to a target word can affect responses to the target even when another item intervenes between them. In this article, the results of 4 experiments are presented and sequential effects are shown to be in accord with compound-cue theory.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8744970     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Semantic priming without association: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  M Lucas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Two predictions of a compound cue model of priming.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-09

3.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

4.  Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

5.  Reading "glasses" will prime "vision," but reading a pair of "glasses" will not.

Authors:  J H Neely; C A VerWys; T A Kahan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

6.  Automaticity in fast lexical decision sequential effects: much like telling left from right.

Authors:  Roderick Garton; John A Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Compound cuing in free recall.

Authors:  Lynn J Lohnas; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Jesse Sargent; Catherine Trinh Ngo
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-02-25

9.  Dynamic adjustment of lexical processing in the lexical decision task: Cross-trial sequence effects.

Authors:  David A Balota; Andrew J Aschenbrenner; Melvin J Yap
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The fSAM model of false recall.

Authors:  Daniel R Kimball; Troy A Smith; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.