Literature DB >> 9519695

Reading "glasses" will prime "vision," but reading a pair of "glasses" will not.

J H Neely1, C A VerWys, T A Kahan.   

Abstract

In a lexical decision task with two primes and a target, the target was preceded 300 msec by the second prime (P2) which in turn was preceded by a brief forward and backward masked first prime (P1). When P1 and P2 were unrelated, reaction times were faster when the target was related to P2 (e.g., wave SALT ... pepper) than when the target was unrelated to P2 (and P1--e.g., wave LOAN ... pepper). However, this semantic priming effect was reduced to statistically nonsignificant levels when P1 and P2 were repetitions of the same word. That is, priming did not occur for salt SALT ... pepper relative to loan LOAN ... pepper. This reduction in priming was observed whether P2 and the target were strongly or weakly related. These findings raise problems for current accounts of semantic priming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519695     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming?

Authors:  J R Shelton; R C Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.

Authors:  F J Friedrich; A Henik; J Tzelgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task.

Authors:  I Fischler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-05

4.  Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: some words do, some words don't ... sometimes, some places.

Authors:  C Chiarello; C Burgess; L Richards; A Pollock
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.

Authors:  J H Neely; D E Keefe; K L Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

9.  Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes.

Authors:  K den Heyer; K Briand; G L Dannenbring
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

10.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers.

Authors:  Sebastian Wallot; Geoff Hollis; Marieke van Rooij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  From "cracking the orthographic code" to "playing with language": toward a usage-based foundation of the reading process.

Authors:  Sebastian Wallot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.