Literature DB >> 20033598

Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.

Qi Guo1, Jiaqing Shao, Virginie F Ruiz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a detailed study of fractal-based methods for texture characterization of mammographic mass lesions and architectural distortion. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of fractal and lacunarity analysis for the characterization and classification of both tumor lesions and normal breast parenchyma in mammography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted comparative evaluations of five popular fractal dimension estimation methods for the characterization of the texture of mass lesions and architectural distortion. We applied the concept of lacunarity to the description of the spatial distribution of the pixel intensities in mammographic images. These methods were tested with a set of 57 breast masses and 60 normal breast parenchyma (dataset1), and with another set of 19 architectural distortions and 41 normal breast parenchyma (dataset2). Support vector machines (SVM) were used as a pattern classification method for tumor classification.
RESULTS: Experimental results showed that the fractal dimension of region of interest (ROIs) depicting mass lesions and architectural distortion was statistically significantly lower than that of normal breast parenchyma for all five methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that fractional Brownian motion (FBM) method generated the highest area under ROC curve (A ( z ) = 0.839 for dataset1, 0.828 for dataset2, respectively) among five methods for both datasets. Lacunarity analysis showed that the ROIs depicting mass lesions and architectural distortion had higher lacunarities than those of ROIs depicting normal breast parenchyma. The combination of FBM fractal dimension and lacunarity yielded the highest A ( z ) value (0.903 and 0.875, respectively) than those based on single feature alone for both given datasets. The application of the SVM improved the performance of the fractal-based features in differentiating tumor lesions from normal breast parenchyma by generating higher A ( z ) value.
CONCLUSION: FBM texture model is the most appropriate model for characterizing mammographic images due to self-affinity assumption of the method being a better approximation. Lacunarity is an effective counterpart measure of the fractal dimension in texture feature extraction in mammographic images. The classification results obtained in this work suggest that the SVM is an effective method with great potential for classification in mammographic image analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20033598     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0276-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  26 in total

1.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.

Authors:  J J Heine; R P Velthuizen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn?

Authors:  H C Burrell; A J Evans; A R Wilson; S E Pinder
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  Computer-aided detection in mammography.

Authors:  S M Astley; F J Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  H Li; K J Liu; S C Lo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The application of fractal analysis to mammographic tissue classification.

Authors:  C E Priebe; J L Solka; R A Lorey; G W Rogers; W L Poston; M Kallergi; W Qian; L P Clarke; R A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.

Authors:  B C Yankaskas; M J Schell; R E Bird; D A Desrochers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection.

Authors:  M J M Broeders; N C Onland-Moret; H J T M Rijken; J H C L Hendriks; A L M Verbeek; R Holland
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.

Authors:  H C Burrell; D M Sibbering; A R Wilson; S E Pinder; A J Evans; L J Yeoman; C W Elston; I O Ellis; R W Blamey; J F Robertson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

1.  Measures of angular spread and entropy for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Shantanu Banik; Rangaraj M Rangayyan; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Automated Machine Learning Diagnostic Support System as a Computational Biomarker for Detecting Drug-Induced Liver Injury Patterns in Whole Slide Liver Pathology Images.

Authors:  Munish Puri
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 1.738

6.  Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.

Authors:  Rangaraj M Rangayyan; Shantanu Banik; J E Leo Desautels
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.

Authors:  S M A Beheshti; H AhmadiNoubari; E Fatemizadeh; M Khalili
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Heterogeneity of focal breast lesions and surrounding tissue assessed by mammographic texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumor invasion and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Olga Strukowska; Karoline Skogen; Rupert Young; Chris Chatwin; Ken Miles
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.