BACKGROUND: Results of aortic valve surgery in octogenarians have been evaluated as event-free survival. However, little attention has been given to quality of life aspects. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients, mean age 83 +/- 2 years, undergoing valve replacement due to aortic stenosis, were compared to 30 patients, mean age 71 +/- 3 years, undergoing the same procedure. Mortality, morbidity and quality of life were studied. An interview was performed before surgery and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The questionnaire contained items related to self-rated health, symptoms, physical ability, sleep disturbances and social and emotional functioning. RESULTS: Pre-operatively the older patient group was in a worse condition with a higher NYHA functional class and a more pronounced cardiomegaly. They had more cardiac symptoms and were more depressed. The control group had a higher score for physical ability and rated their quality of life as better. Postoperatively there was a higher early mortality rate in the octogenarians (9% vs 0%; ns). After 3 months, improvement of functional status and relief of symptoms was observed in both groups. Physical ability improved and the depression score decreased significantly in both groups. Self-rated health and quality of life improved. One year after valve replacement the improvement in quality of life was of a similar magnitude in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Following aortic valve replacement, octogenarians, despite a more compromised pre-operative status showed an improvement in symptomatology, physical ability and general well being, of a similar magnitude to that of the younger patients group. These findings lend further support to the recommendation that valve replacement should be performed in octogenarians with symptomatic aortic stenosis.
BACKGROUND: Results of aortic valve surgery in octogenarians have been evaluated as event-free survival. However, little attention has been given to quality of life aspects. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients, mean age 83 +/- 2 years, undergoing valve replacement due to aortic stenosis, were compared to 30 patients, mean age 71 +/- 3 years, undergoing the same procedure. Mortality, morbidity and quality of life were studied. An interview was performed before surgery and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The questionnaire contained items related to self-rated health, symptoms, physical ability, sleep disturbances and social and emotional functioning. RESULTS: Pre-operatively the older patient group was in a worse condition with a higher NYHA functional class and a more pronounced cardiomegaly. They had more cardiac symptoms and were more depressed. The control group had a higher score for physical ability and rated their quality of life as better. Postoperatively there was a higher early mortality rate in the octogenarians (9% vs 0%; ns). After 3 months, improvement of functional status and relief of symptoms was observed in both groups. Physical ability improved and the depression score decreased significantly in both groups. Self-rated health and quality of life improved. One year after valve replacement the improvement in quality of life was of a similar magnitude in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Following aortic valve replacement, octogenarians, despite a more compromised pre-operative status showed an improvement in symptomatology, physical ability and general well being, of a similar magnitude to that of the younger patients group. These findings lend further support to the recommendation that valve replacement should be performed in octogenarians with symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Authors: Udo Abah; Mike Dunne; Andrew Cook; Stephen Hoole; Carol Brayne; Luke Vale; Stephen Large Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Pontus Andell; Xinjun Li; Andreas Martinsson; Charlotte Andersson; Martin Stagmo; Bengt Zöller; Kristina Sundquist; J Gustav Smith Journal: Heart Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 5.994