Literature DB >> 25922099

Does quality of life improve in octogenarians following cardiac surgery? A systematic review.

Udo Abah1, Mike Dunne1, Andrew Cook2, Stephen Hoole1, Carol Brayne3, Luke Vale4, Stephen Large1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current outcome measures in cardiac surgery are largely described in terms of mortality. Given the changing demographic profiles and increasingly aged populations referred for cardiac surgery this may not be the most appropriate measure. Postoperative quality of life is an outcome of importance to all ages, but perhaps particularly so for those whose absolute life expectancy is limited by virtue of age. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to clarify and summarise the existing evidence regarding postoperative quality of life of older people following cardiac surgery. For the purpose of this review we defined our population as people aged 80 years of age or over.
METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, trial registers and conference abstracts was undertaken to identify studies addressing quality of life following cardiac surgery in patients 80 or over.
RESULTS: Forty-four studies were identified that addressed this topic, of these nine were prospective therefore overall conclusions are drawn from largely retrospective observational studies. No randomised controlled data were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall there appears to be an improvement in quality of life in the majority of elderly patients following cardiac surgery, however there was a minority in whom quality of life declined (8-19%). There is an urgent need to validate these data and if correct to develop a robust prediction tool to identify these patients before surgery. Such a tool could guide informed consent, policy development and resource allocation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GERIATRIC MEDICINE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25922099      PMCID: PMC4420984          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The studies included in our systematic review are largely retrospective in nature. The majority of studies were of fair or poor quality as assessed by the US Preventative Services Task Force Quality Rating Criteria. The studies did not provide sufficient quantitative data for meta-analysis.

Introduction

The two essential reasons to offer cardiac surgery are to improve quality of life (QoL) and prognosis. The latter probably becomes less important with increasing age. Useful preoperative risk calculators help surgeons estimate an individual's chance of death as a complication of planned cardiac surgery,1 but there is little to guide the likelihood of an improved QoL following surgery. This suggests that heart surgeons are falling short when seeking informed consent for their planned operations; especially so in the elderly where life's quality is likely to be valued over duration. This paper reviews the current literature on QoL following cardiac surgery in older participants. It provides a synthesis of evidence to identify gaps in our knowledge for new research, which is needed to inform patients as they consider consent for surgery and perhaps for health economists in resource allocation.

Methods

This systematic review was designed and reported following PRISMA criteria.2 Studies addressing QoL and functional status following cardiac surgery in patients aged 80 and over were identified by searching the electronic databases; MEDLINE (1950-22 February 2013, including articles in review stage), EMBASE (1980-22 February 2013) and the Cochrane Library (Issue 1 of 12 January 2013). A broad/sensitive search strategy was employed: truncated free-text searches within titles/abstracts/keywords were paired with exploded subject heading searches (MeSH and EMTREE). Search strategy/search terms used (TERMS IN CAPITALS are subject heading searches, ‘exp’ = exploded, MeSH terms given, equivalent EMTREE headings used in EMBASE): ‘“quality of life” OR qol’ in title/abstracts/keywords OR exp QUALITY OF LIFE/AND ‘(Heart* NEXT surg*) OR (heart* NEXT operat*) OR (cardi* NEXT surg*) OR (cardi* NEXT operat*)’ in title/abstracts/keywords OR exp CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES/OR THORACIC SURGERY/AND ‘8? NEXT yr? OR 8? NEXT year? OR 8?yr? OR 8?year? OR octagen* OR eighty NEAR/2 year? OR 9? NEXT yr? OR 9? NEXT year? OR 9?yr? OR 9?year? OR nonagen* OR ninety NEAR/2 year?’ OR AGED, 80 AND OVER in title/abstracts/keywords. All searches were completed on 22 February 2013. An advanced Google search, search of the National Health Service (NHS) Evidence portal (http://www.evidence.nhs.uk/), and the reference lists of articles were reviewed to check the rigour of the database search strategy. No language, publication date or publication status restrictions were imposed; however during the article review stage, manuscripts that were not in English language were excluded. Two reviewers (UA/MD) performed eligibility assessments independently in an un-blinded standardised manner. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by consensus. Figure 1 details study selection.
Figure 1

PRISMA flow chart of study selection.

PRISMA flow chart of study selection.

Data collection process

A data extraction sheet was pilot tested on the first 10 studies identified and refined accordingly. Information was extracted from each study on: (1) characteristics of study participants (2) type of operation and (3) QoL outcome measure employed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the US Preventative Services Task Force Quality Rating Criteria3 (USPSTFQR).

Quality of life assessment tools

The primary outcome measure was QoL of octogenarians (>80 years) following cardiac surgery. Assessment tools in the identified studies ranged from established QoL measures to bespoke questionnaires and objective assessments of independence, including physical functioning and activities of daily living. Of the validated tools used, the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36)4 and Karnofsky performance status score5 were most commonly employed. The SF-36 is validated for the assessment of QoL in multiple disease states including cardiovascular disease and elderly populations.6 Introduced in 19907 and upgraded to V.2 in 1996,8 the questionnaire consists of 36 questions covering 8 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health), scaled from 0 to 100, a higher score indicates a better QoL. The domains are summarised into physical and mental health scores. The SF-12 is a shortened version covering the same eight domains. The Karnofsky score addresses functional impairment and was originally designed to assess overall performance status in patients with cancer. It is scored in 10% increments; from normal activity (100%), through to death at 0%. Other QoL and functional measures employed throughout the literature include; the Seattle Angina Questionnaire9 and Barthel Index,10 Nottingham Health profile,11 EQ-5D-3L12 Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS),13 Swedish health-related quality of life survey (SWED-QUAL)14 and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ).15

Results

Forty-four studies were identified that reported the QoL of octogenarians following cardiac surgery. Eight of the studies reported functional status as a measurement of QoL; these studies are included in our results (table 1). Twenty-three studies originated from Europe, 10 from the USA, 7 from Canada, 3 from Australia and 1 from Japan. The mean age of study participants ranged from 81 to 86.5 years and the study size from 21 to 1062 participants. Thirty-six of the 44 studies reported preoperative comorbidities but significant variation of conditions reported prevents meaningful comparison. The majority of studies were retrospective, however, nine studies followed patients prospectively allowing for direct comparison before and after surgery.
Table 1

Prospective studies

Reference study type (quality of study: USPSTFQR score)Surgery: average ageNumber in study (survivors, % assessed for QoL)QoL toolLength of follow-upOutcome
Olsson et al16 Prospective (Fair quality)Stockholm, SwedenAVRMean 83±232 (25, 96%)Self-designed questionnaire3 and 12 monthsPhysical ability improved, depression decreased, improvement in self-rated health
Deutsch et al17Prospective (Conference abstract)Munchen, GermanyAll cardiac surgeryMedian 82.5 (80–91.8)87 (Not specified)SF-363 monthsThe SF-36 scores for physical functioning (41.8 vs 48.7, p=0.05), role-physical (25.8 vs 36.4, p=0.05), bodily-pain (51.9 vs 74.4, p=0.001) and vitality (41.2 vs 49.8, p=0.006) increased 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences found for general health (54.3 vs 56.6, p=0.38), mental health (67.9 vs 71.8, p=0.1) role-emotional (59.5 vs 60.5, p=0.9), social functioning (75.4 vs 73.6, p=0.63) scores
Ferrari et al18Group 1: RetrospectiveGroup 2: Prospective (Conference abstract)Modena, ItalyAll cardiac surgeryNot documentedGroup 1: 192Group 2: 21 (Not specified)SF-36HADSSAQGroup 1: 5–7 yearsGroup 2: not specifiedGroup 1: satisfaction with treatment in 80%, freedom from cardiac symptoms in 62% and overall well-being in 78% of cases.Group 2: improvement of QoL (SF-36 mean total score 57.1 vs 73.5, p=0.001), clinical conditions and anxiety-depressive symptoms (p=0.001 both for HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression)
Pontoni et al19Group 1: RetrospectiveGroup 2: Prospective (Conference abstract)Modena, ItalyAll cardiac surgeryNot documentedGroup 1: 86Group 2: 21 (Not specified)SF-36HADSSAQGroup 1: Mean 5.5 yearsGroup 2: 6 monthsGroup 1: Retrospective analysis: absence of physical limitation in 50% of patients, treatment satisfaction in 80%, satisfactory well-being and enjoyment of life in 78%Group 2: QoL showed significant improvement in 4 of 5 modified SAQ domains (except of treatment satisfaction), 6 of 8 SF-36 domains (except of Emotional Role Limitation and Vitality) and in depression and anxiety HADS subscales
Oldroyd et al20Prospective (Conference abstract)Victoria, AustraliaAll cardiac surgeryMean 83.2±2.563 (Not specified)SF-363 months51(81%) felt that cardiac surgery had been worthwhile, despite no significant change in SF-36 scores
Lam et al21Prospective (Poor quality)Ontario, CanadaAVR±CABGMean 83.7±3.4 (80–96)58 (20, 35%)SF-366 monthsBetter scores for bodily pain, vitality, social functioning and mental health than patients <80. Better scores for bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning and mental health than the general population >75
Wilson et al22Prospective (Fair quality)New York, USACABGMean 82 (80–88)73 (71, 97%)Karnofsky performance scoreUp to 5 yearsKarnofsky performance score improved from a mean 67 to 78 (p<0.05), median of 50–80. 83% independent of ADLs. 97% living at home
Khan et al23Prospective (Fair quality)San Francisco, USAValve surgery±CABGMean 83.5 (80–89)61 (54, 100%)Karnofsky performance score1 and 3 monthsMedian Karnofsky score increased from 30% to 80% 1 month post-operatively, sustained at 3-month follow-up
Glower et al24Prospective (Fair quality)North Carolina, USACABGMean 81±2 (80–93)86 (74, 100%)Karnofsky performance scoreQoL data at discharge Mean 17±17 monthsMedian Karnofsky score improved from 20% to 70% (p=0.0001) Mean Karnofsky score improved from 27±15 preoperatively to 60±27%

ADL, activities of daily living; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronory artery bypass graft; HADS, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; QoL, quality of life; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form 36.

Prospective studies ADL, activities of daily living; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronory artery bypass graft; HADS, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; QoL, quality of life; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form 36.

Prospective studies

Nine prospective studies were identified, five studies employed the SF-36, three the Karnofsky score and one used a self-designed questionnaire (table 1). These studies included 780 patients, with an age range of 80–96. Length of follow-up varied from 3 months to 7 years. Those studies employing the SF-36 and one self-designed questionnaire16 found generally an overall improvement after surgery,17–19 with one study demonstrating no significant difference at 3 months.20 Domains that significantly improved varied between studies. Superior SF-36 scores were also found when comparing octogenarians to a younger cohort and an age-matched general population.21 The three studies using Karnofsky score22–24 found significant improvement in functional status following surgery.

Retrospective studies

Thirty-five retrospective studies were identified and five used multiple QoL tools (table 2). These studies included 8456 patients, with an age range of 80–99 and length of follow-up that varied from 6 months to 11.8 years. The tools employed in these studies included SF-36 in 10 studies, SF-12 in 3, self-designed questionnaires in 11, Karnofsky performance score in 4, SAQ in 4, Barthel index in 3, SWED-QAL 2, EQ-5D in 1, Nottingham Health Index in 1 and MLHFQ in 1. Eleven studies compared QoL following cardiac surgery to an age-matched cohort of the general population. Nine studies found comparable or superior QoL scores for the study population in most domains.25–33 One study found lower scores in the physical domains of the study population.34 Two studies reported poorer outcomes in women,35 36 however a third paper revealed the opposite.29 Three studies compared postoperative QoL in octogenarians against a younger patient cohort. While the first found superior SF-36 scores in the majority of domains37 the second found inferior SF-12 summary scores in the octogenarian cohort38 and the third found significantly lower physical function and the physical component summary scores in octogenarians.39 Two studies asked patients for their subjective comparison of QoL following surgery with that before. Both found a general improvement in QoL after surgery,40 although the second found a 33% reduction in physical fitness.41 The Seattle Angina Questionnaire was used to report QoL in three studies41–43 and reported that the majority of patients had a good functional status following surgery and were satisfied with their QoL. Eleven studies employed self-designed questionnaires, reporting an improvement in QoL in the majority of patients.44–54 However, in a small but significant minority QoL decreased following surgery. One study reported that QoL worsened in 12%,46 a second found a reduction in 15%,47 a third study reported that 17.8% felt their autonomy was worse following surgery48 and a forth reported that 13.2% felt their dependence on social support had increased. Interestingly, at 1 month following surgery 43% would not recommend surgery. This fell to 14% at 1 year.49 In one study multivariate analysis revealed female gender to be the only predictor of impaired autonomy50 and a second found poor left ventricular ejection fraction was an independent factor reducing QoL.44 Lower QoL scores in females were also demonstrated in one study employing the Nottingham Health profile54 Five studies employed the Karnofsky and/or Barthel Index to report the functional status of octogenarians following cardiac surgery and found an improvement in the majority of patients.55–59
Table 2

Retrospective studies

Reference study type (quality of study: USPSTFQR score)Surgery: average ageNumber in study (survivors, % assessed for QoL)QoL toolLength of follow-upOutcome
Fruitman et al25Retrospective (Fair quality)Nova Scotia, CanadaAll cardiac surgeryMean 83±2.5 (80–92)127 (103, 96.1%)SF-36SAQMean 15.7 (4.7–27.7) monthsSF-36 scores were equal to or better than those for the general population 83.7% living in their own home, 74.8% rated their health, as good or excellent, 82.5% would undergo operation again
Kurlansky et al26Retrospective (Good quality)Florida, USACABGMean 83.1±2.8 (80–99)1062 (555, 98.2%)SF-36Mean 3.4 (0.1–12.6) yearsSF-36 scores comparable to age-adjusted norms in mental and physical summary scores
Sjogren et al27Retrospective (Fair quality)Lund, SwedenAll cardiac surgeryMean 81.8±2.3 (80–91)117 (41, 95%)SF-36Mean 8.3 ±1.9 yearsQoL comparable to age-matched population, lower physical function, but less bodily pain in study population
Vicchio et al 28Retrospective (Fair quality)Naples, ItalyAVR± CABGBP: Mean 82.9±2.7MP: Mean 81.8±1.8160 (125, 97.6%)SF-36Mean 3.4±2.8 yearsScores higher than age-matched and sex-matched Italian population in all domains other than vitality
Collins et al29Retrospective (Fair quality)Stockholm, SwedenAll cardiac surgeryMean 81.9±1.3 (80–84)183 (155, 94.2%)SWED-QUAL1–6 yearsPatients had significantly better physical functioning, satisfaction with physical functioning, relief of pain and emotional well-being (p=0.01) compared to the normal population
Kurlansky et al30Retrospective (Good quality)Florida, USACABG(Arterial vs SVG)SVG: Mean 83.5±3.0 (80–99)ART+SVG: Mean 82.5±2.5 (80–92)987 Arterial(247/97%)SVG (247/98.8%)SF-36Arterial 3.8 years (0.4–12.6)SVG 3.1 (0.2–11.2)Patients with arterial grafts scored significantly higher than SVG patients and age-adjusted normal participants
Ghanta et al31Retrospective (Good quality)Massachusetts, USACABG, AVR±CABGMean 82 (80–94)459 (158, 72%)SF-12Median 7.9 yearsSurvivors’ median quality of life mental health score was higher (55.2 vs 48.9; p<0.05) and physical health score was equivalent (39.3 vs 39.8; p=0.66) to the general elderly population
Krane et al32Retrospective (Fair quality)Munich, GermanyCABG, AVR±CABGMean 82.3 (80–94)1003 (514, 75.1%)SF-36Mean 3.62±2.42 yearsPhysical functioning 49.7; role-emotional 58.5; social functioning 76.2; mental health 69.7, bodily pain 70.5, vitality 48.7, role-physical 43.6, general health 55.5. Bodily pain, general health higher than age-matched population (p<0.01). Role-physical and role-emotional lower (p<0.02) Summarised physical health score increased (p<0.05) compared with the general population, the mental health summarised scores showed no difference
Sundt et al33Retrospective (Fair quality)St Louis, USAAVR±other cardiac procedureMean 83.5±2.6 (80.1–90.6)133 (65, 98%)SF-36Up to 5 yearsSF-36 scores comparable to general population >75. Participants scored higher than the control population in 5 areas; bodily pain, general health, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health
Schonebeck et al34Retrospective (Conference abstract)Hamberg, GermanyAll cardiac surgeryMean 82±2.5107 (Not specified)SF-36Not specifiedLower scores for physical functioning (37±10.5), general health (44.1±11.0), physical role (41.0±7.8), and physical component summary (44.7±9.3) compared to the normal population (p=0.001)
Ghosh et al35Retrospective (Fair quality)Salzburg, AustriaAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.2±1.8212 (186, not specified)EQ-5DMean 40.2 (2–144) monthsConcluded excellent postoperative QoL. Mean EQ-5D score of 6.5.Score slightly poorer in women (6.7), than men (6.2)
Spaziano et al36Retrospective (Fair quality)Quebec, CanadaValve replacementMean 82 (80–89)133 (118, 64.4%)SF-12v2MLHFQMean 2.0±1.1 yearsMen similar to age-matched population. Women similar in physical component scale but lower mental component. Data from MLHFQ revealed worse QoL in females than in males, both on the physical and emotional scales
Aboud et al37Retrospective (Fair quality)Jena, GermanyAVRNot documented<53 (Not specified)SF-36Mean 21.4 months(18–24)SF-36 scores better in bodily pain, mental health, social functioning, role emotional in patients >80
Sen et al38Retrospective (Good quality)Giessen, GermanyCABGMean 82.3±2.13240 (97.1%)SF-12Mean 53 monthsFour years after surgery, 95.2% of the octogenarians lived alone, with a partner or with relatives, and only 4% required permanent nursing care. 83.9% of the octogenarians would recommend surgery to their friends and relatives for relief of symptoms. Mental component scores higher than physical component scores and overall summary scores lower than in a younger age group
Nydegger et al39Retrospective (Conference abstract)Zurich, SwitzerlandAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.2±2.753 (Not specified)SF-361 yearPhysical function (p=0.002) and the physical component summary (p=0.03) were lower in patients >80. The mental component summary was similar between both groups (compared with patients <80)
Levin et al40Retrospective (Poor quality)Lund, SwedenAVR±CABG>85Mean 86.5±1.5 (85–91)21 (13, 100%)SWED-QUAL9–83 monthsSignificant improvement in physical functioning, satisfaction with physical ability, sleep, health status and perception of general health
Folkman et al41Retrospective (Fair quality)Vienna, AustriaAVR±CABGMean 82.9±2.5154 (126, 100%)SAQ1 yearImprovement in QoL in 96% reduction in physical fitness in 33%
Huber et al42Retrospective (Fair quality)Inselspital, SwitzerlandCABG, AVR±CABGMean 82.3±2.1 (80–91)136 (120, 100%)SAQMean 890 (69–1853) days81% had no or ‘little’ disability in ADL, 65% very satisfied with QoL
Graham et al43Retrospective (Fair quality)Calgary, CanadaCABG (compared with PCI and medical mx)Median 81.866 at 1 year55 at 3 yearsSAQAt 1 and 3 yearsAll domains (angina stability, angina frequency, QoL, treatment satisfaction) other than exertional capacity significantly better with CABG than medical management, at both 1 and 3 years
Kamiya et al44Retrospective (Poor quality)Tokyo, JapanCABG+PCIMean 82.1±2.128 (15, 100%)Self-designed based on SAQMean 39.9±30.1 months80% no limitation dressing, 66.7% no or little limitation walking 300 m, 86.7% satisfied with their treatment
Nikolaidis et al45Retrospective (Fair quality)Southampton, UKAVR±CABGMean 82.9±2.3345 (279, 62%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 39.3±29 months83.7% satisfied with operation outcome, 82% independent personal care, 88.3% had positive feelings about life
Tsai et al46Retrospective (Fair quality)California, USAAll cardiac surgery Mean 83.1±2.7 (80–94)528 (Not specified)Self-designed questionnaire6 months70% improved QoL, 18% same, 12% worse. 38% active lives, 26% sedentary, 35% restricted
Schmidtler et al47Retrospective (Good quality)Munich GermanyAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.6±2.9 (80–93)641 (227/90%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 3.6 (0.1–11.8) yearsAt mid-term follow-up QoL had improved in 54%, there was no difference in 31% and was impaired in 15%. 80% of all surviving patients lived in their own home
Maillet et al48Retrospective (Fair quality)Saint-Denis, FranceAVR±CABGMean 83.7±3.3 (80–94)84 (51/100%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 723±404 days91.1% living in their own homes, Self-rated health ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ in 76.8%, 66.1% reported health had improved postoperatively, 60.7% would have operation again, 26.7% required help for ADL. 17.8% felt autonomy was worse postoperatively
Goyal et al49Prospective (Fair quality)Victoria, AustraliaAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.4 (80–94)100 (80,85%)Self-designed questionnaire6–60 months86.76% were less dependent on others, 13.23% felt their dependence on social support had increased, 80.9% were feeling well and looking positively to the future, 94.2% patients would have the procedure again, in retrospect, 41.2% lived alone
Kirsch et al50Retrospective (Fair quality)Creteil, FranceAll cardiac surgeryMean 83±2.7 (80–91)191 (129, 97%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 22.24 (0–73.3) months64% of long-term survivors fully autonomous, female sex only independent predictor of impaired autonomy, 83% satisfied with QoL
Kolh et al51Retrospective (Fair quality)Liege, BelgiumAVRMean 82.8±2.4 (80–94)220 (59%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 58.2 months91% believed that having heart surgery after age 80 years was a good choice, and similarly 88% felt as good as or better than they had preoperatively
Hewitt et al52Retrospective (Fair quality)Perth, AustraliaAll cardiac surgeryMean 8.13±1.2 (80–88)64 (44/100%)Modified SF-36 (16 questions)1 month, 1 year, final+mean 2.8±0.8 years98% thought surgery was worthwhile and would recommend to a friend and 86% were living independently
Diegeler et al53Retrospective (Fair quality)Gottingen, GermanyAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.2±1.79(80–87)54 (43, 100%)Self-designed questionnaireMean 26.2±16.54 (6–91) monthsOf 43 survivors 41 lived independently, 38 capable of ADLs without help. 40 of the 43 survivors described significant improvement in their QoL
Ennker et al54Retrospective (Fair quality)Baden, GermanyStentless AVRMean 82±276 (Not specified)Nottingham health profileMean 35±23 monthsQoL equal to or better than general population. Women had slightly lower QoL than men
Kumar et al55Retrospective (Fair quality)Baltimore, USAAll cardiac surgeryGroup 1 Mean 83.2±2.2 (80–87)Group 2 Mean 83.0±2.0 (80–89)Group 1:15 (8/100%)Group 2: 52 (38/100%)Karnofsky performance scoreSelf-designed questionnaireMean 1.5 yearsImprovement in QoL, 75% group 1 and 84% group 2, would have operation in retrospect. Mean Karnofsky dependency category decreased from 2.0±0.4 to 1.5±0.5 p<0.01
NNwaejike et al56Retrospective (Fair quality)Maryland, USAAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.4±1.28 (80–88)66 (Not specified)Barthel IndexNot specifiedMean Barthel Index 17.7 (min 0, max 20)
Chaturvedi et al57Retrospective (Good quality)Quebec, CanadaAll cardiac surgeryMean 82.5 (80–92)300 (188, 100%)Barthel IndexKarnofsky performance scoreUp to 5 yearsAt 3.6 years: 64.9% autonomous, 28.1% semiautonomous, and 9.2% dependent. 71.8% were at home, 21.2% in a residence, and 6.9% in a supervised setting
Leung et al58Retrospective (Fair quality)Quebec, CanadaValve surgery±CABGMean 8.5 (80–92)185 (110, 100%)Karnofsky performance scoreBarthel IndexMean 38 (7–78) months66% autonomous, 26% semiautonomous, 8% dependent72% living at home, 19% in residence, 9% in a supervised nursing facility
Caus et al59Retrospective (Fair quality)Ottawa, CanadaAVRNot documented101 (61, not specified)Karnofsky performance scoreMean 2.7 years per patientMean Karnofsky score 61

ADL, activities of daily living; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronory artery bypass graft; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QoL, quality of life; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form 36; SVG, Saphenous vein grafts; SWED-QUAL, The Swedish health-related quality of life survey.

Retrospective studies ADL, activities of daily living; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronory artery bypass graft; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QoL, quality of life; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form 36; SVG, Saphenous vein grafts; SWED-QUAL, The Swedish health-related quality of life survey.

Discussion

This systematic review was constructed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy of the key medical electronic databases identified 44 studies. These included 9236 patients in total and all studies were retrospective but for 9. There was marked heterogeneity between studies. In general both prospective and retrospective series indicated an improvement in postoperative QoL for the majority of patients or a postoperative QoL comparable to an age-matched general population. Established tools used in measurement of QoL and functional status are validated and well designed. Self-designed questionnaires, though not validated, identified a significant minority in whom QoL fell after surgery (8–19%). Variable results may reflect different populations studied and individual centre's selection bias for surgery, as well as disparities in measurement methods. One key difference is the inclusion of a value for death, as overall results will differ if death is accounted for rather than excluded. The Karnofsky Performance Score and EQ-5D include a score for death. Only one of the seven studies employing these tools attributed a score for death.22 Another key factor affecting QoL after surgery is the time at which it was measured. It is inevitable that QoL worsens immediately following surgery and hopefully improves as the patient recovers. However, while there is evidence of improvement over the first postoperative year,49 a number of studies detailing QoL at multiple time points found no significant interval change.16 23 In our analysis there is insufficient evidence to describe the postoperative pattern of QoL. The key finding of this review is the apparent decrease in QoL in 8–19% of octogenarians following cardiac surgery. It is essential to validate this finding and to identify these patients so that at worst, harm to their well-being can be avoided and at best, we can better understand who these individuals are. A prediction model for postoperative QoL is required to allow clinicians to select and help patients better understand the consequences of their heart surgery and hence improve the quality of patients’ informed consent.

Conclusion

QoL following cardiac surgery in octogenarians improves in the majority of patients. However some 8%–19% appear to experience a fall in QoL and regret their decision to go forward with heart surgery. Considering the expanding numbers of elderly patients in contemporary practice, it is desirable to identify patients who will not enjoy an improvement in QoL. At a population level such work may also inform the appropriate provision of limited healthcare resources. A prediction model for postoperative QoL is required to help patients better understand the consequences of surgery, and hence improve the quality of their informed consent.
  47 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  Functional quality of life following open valve surgery in high-risk octogenarians.

Authors:  Stephane Leung Wai Sang; Rakesh K Chaturvedi; Sameena Iqbal; Kevin Lachapelle; Benoit de Varennes
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Quality of life in octagenarians after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Michael F Wilson; Mirza K Baig; Hashmat Ashraf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Outcome and quality of life after cardiac surgery in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shiromani Goyal; Margaret Henry; Morteza Mohajeri
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Quality of life after coronary revascularization in the elderly.

Authors:  Michelle M Graham; Colleen M Norris; P Diane Galbraith; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  The Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL).

Authors:  B Brorsson; J Ifver; R D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.

Authors:  Jürgen Ennker; Fatmir Dalladaku; Ulrich Rosendahl; Ina Carolin Ennker; Manfred Mauser; Ines Florath
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.620

8.  Cardiac valve surgery in octogenarians: improving quality of life and functional status.

Authors:  J H Khan; D B McElhinney; T S Hall; S H Merrick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

9.  Cardiac operations in octogenarians: perioperative risk factors for death and impaired autonomy.

Authors:  M Kirsch; L Guesnier; P LeBesnerais; M L Hillion; M Debauchez; J Seguin; D Y Loisance
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Aortic valve replacement in patients older than 85 years: outcomes and the effect on their quality of life.

Authors:  I L Levin; G K Olivecrona; L I Thulin; S B Olsson
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.439

View more
  11 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life following Surgery for Native and Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis.

Authors:  Shekhar Saha; Ralitsa Mladenova; Caroline Radner; Konstanze Maria Horke; Joscha Buech; Philipp Schnackenburg; Ahmad Ali; Sven Peterss; Gerd Juchem; Maximilian Luehr; Christian Hagl; Dominik Joskowiak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Timothy Luke Surman; John Matthew Abrahams; Jaewon Kim; Hayley Elizabeth Surman; Ross Roberts-Thomson; Joseph Matthew Montarello; James Edwards; Michael Worthington; John Beltrame
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Hospital mortality of patients aged 80 and older after surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissection in Japan.

Authors:  Tetsu Ohnuma; Daisuke Shinjo; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Systematic review of preoperative physical activity and its impact on postcardiac surgical outcomes.

Authors:  D Scott Kehler; Andrew N Stammers; Navdeep Tangri; Brett Hiebert; Randy Fransoo; Annette S H Schultz; Kerry Macdonald; Nicholas Giacomontonio; Ansar Hassan; Jean-Francois Légaré; Rakesh C Arora; Todd A Duhamel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Quality of life 10 years after cardiac surgery in adults: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Andrea Perrotti; Fiona Ecarnot; Francesco Monaco; Enrica Dorigo; Palmiero Monteleone; Guillaume Besch; Sidney Chocron
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Quality of life after coronary bypass: a multicentre study of routinely collected health data in the Netherlands†.

Authors:  Fredrike Blokzijl; Saskia Houterman; Bart H M van Straten; Edgar Daeter; George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma; Willem Dieperink; Michiel F Reneman; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst; Massimo A Mariani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Anxiety and health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Yalcin Guzelhan; Murat Ugurlucan; Didem Melis Oztas; Metin Onur Beyaz; Orcun Unal; Nilufer Bektas; Cenk Conkbayir; Ufuk Alpagut; Nilgun Bozbuga
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2020-04-08

8.  Determinants of non-recovery in physical health-related quality of life one year after cardiac surgery: a prospective single Centre observational study.

Authors:  Hilda Rijnhart-de Jong; Jo Haenen; Goris Bol Raap; Lilian Jekel; Tessel Vossenberg; Olga Bondarenko; Christiaan Boerma
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Preoperative determinants of quality of life a year after coronary artery bypass grafting: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa Verwijmeren; Peter Gerben Noordzij; Edgar Jozeph Daeter; Bas van Zaane; Linda Margaretha Peelen; Eric Paulus Adrianus van Dongen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients before and after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Stana Pačarić; Tajana Turk; Ivan Erić; Želimir Orkić; Anamarija Petek Erić; Andrea Milostić-Srb; Nikolina Farčić; Ivana Barać; Ana Nemčić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.