| Literature DB >> 29599990 |
Karin Olsson1,2, Ulf Näslund1, Johan Nilsson1, Åsa Hörnsten2.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore how patients experienced the recovery process from transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Design: A qualitative approach where in-depth interviews were used. Method: Eleven men and eight women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were individually interviewed 6 months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Grounded theory was used for the analysis.Entities:
Keywords: aortic stenosis; coping; hope; qualitative study; recovery; supportive nursing; transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29599990 PMCID: PMC5867280 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Open ISSN: 2054-1058
Baseline data of the participants
| Men | Women | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | 11 | 8 |
| Age, md (min‐max) | 80 (65–89) | 82 (60–90) |
| Living alone | 7 | 5 |
| Home assistance | 0 | 2 |
| NYHA class III | 4 | 4 |
| NYHA class IV | 7 | 4 |
| Syncope | 2 | 3 |
| Diabetes | 2 | 2 |
| Previous bypass graft surgery | 7 | 3 |
| Previous stroke | 3 | 2 |
| Peripheral vascular disease | 3 | 4 |
| Chronic obstructive lung disease | 5 | 2 |
Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnoea.
Class IV: Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases (NYHA, 1994).
Example from the analytic process
| Focused codes | Initial codes | Transcript |
|---|---|---|
|
Feeling week |
Difficult time after TAVI |
I: How was time after TAVI? |
Figure 1A model of the TAVI trajectory