Literature DB >> 8732745

Clinical breast examination.

W H Goodson1.   

Abstract

An astute clinician has an appreciation of the wide variation possible in normal breasts, but anticipates that the palpation of the breasts of an individual woman will be determined by basic facts concerning typical relative distribution of gland tissue, breast symmetry, the influence of life history, and possibly previous surgery. If the findings of a CBE are not as anticipated, the clinician must find out why this is so. This is a different frame of reference from asking whether a given lump or area should be considered suspicious for cancer. The basic questions are whether the findings of a CBE are consistent with typical breast structure and anatomy and in the context of the woman's life history. If these questions can be answered in the affirmative, the examination is complete; if not, further evaluation is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8732745      PMCID: PMC1303521     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  12 in total

1.  Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination.

Authors:  K J Saunders; C A Pilgrim; H S Pennypacker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  ABC of breast diseases. Breast pain.

Authors:  R E Mansel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-01

3.  Sounding board. Fibrocystic "disease" of the breast--a nondisease?

Authors:  S M Love; R S Gelman; W Silen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Lack of correlation of clinical breast examination with high-risk histopathology.

Authors:  W H Goodson; T R Miller; E A Sickles; R A Upton
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Breast cancer and earlier detection efforts. Realized and unrealized impact on stage.

Authors:  M F Farwell; R S Foster; M C Costanza
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

6.  Efficiency of palpation in clinical detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  L Mahoney; A Csima
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The breast pain clinic: a rational approach to classification and treatment of breast pain.

Authors:  C D Griffith; C S Dowle; C P Hinton; R W Blamey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Evaluation of a palpable breast mass.

Authors:  W L Donegan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  What do breast symptoms mean?

Authors:  W H Goodson; R Mailman; M Jacobson; T K Hunt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90.

Authors:  M J Reeves; P A Newcomb; P L Remington; P M Marcus
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.

Authors:  Mahesh Sultania; Kamal Kataria; Anurag Srivastava; Mahesh Chandra Misra; Rajinder Parshad; Anita Dhar; Smriti Hari; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Use of simulators to explore specialty recommendation for a palpable breast mass.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Rebecca D Ray; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Grace F Jones; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Rescuing the Clinical Breast Examination: Advances in Classifying Technique and Assessing Physician Competency.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Calvin Kwan; Rebbeca D Ray; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.