Literature DB >> 28659675

Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.

Mahesh Sultania1, Kamal Kataria1, Anurag Srivastava1, Mahesh Chandra Misra1, Rajinder Parshad1, Anita Dhar1, Smriti Hari2, Sanjay Thulkar2.   

Abstract

The majority of patients attending breast clinics are found to be suffering from benign conditions. The detailed investigations of every patient would add to the cost of care and burden the laboratories. A detailed clinical evaluation might limit the use of thorough investigations for suspicious lesions only. This cross sectional study involved the patients with various benign and malignant conditions of breast, who attended outpatient clinic and surgical ward at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from June 2009 to May 2011. The study started with a training of the resident (observer 2) in various breast examination techniques by a professor of surgery (observer 1), who was well trained in the discipline of breast surgery by internationally renowned breast experts. The different techniques of breast examination were validated after calculation of intra and inter-observer variation. Excellent agreement was observed between both the observers. The diagnostic accuracy ratio for most variables ranges from 0.9 to 1. The dimpling of skin on inspection had a low kappa (coefficient of agreement = 0.48) and consistency of lymph node on palpation had a kappa 0.38. All other variables showed high agreement. The present study was successful in training the resident and validating the different techniques in physical examination of breast.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Clinical breast examination; Diagnostic indices; Resident training; Validation

Year:  2016        PMID: 28659675      PMCID: PMC5473793          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1470-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  12 in total

1.  Clinical breast examination.

Authors:  W H Goodson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-04

2.  Physician breast examination and breast self-examination.

Authors:  J H Isaacs
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination.

Authors:  K J Saunders; C A Pilgrim; H S Pennypacker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; L A Bunce
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Achieving competence in clinical breast examination.

Authors:  H S Pennypacker; C A Pilgrim
Journal:  Nurse Pract Forum       Date:  1993-06

Review 7.  Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sharon McDonald; Debbie Saslow; Marianne H Alciati
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?

Authors:  M B Barton; R Harris; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Breast cancer: getting the diagnosis right.

Authors:  M A Henderson; J M Cawson; M Bilous
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-11-06       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.

Authors:  Rajul Parikh; Annie Mathai; Shefali Parikh; G Chandra Sekhar; Ravi Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.