Literature DB >> 3768844

Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination.

K J Saunders, C A Pilgrim, H S Pennypacker.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess the relative thoroughness of three search patterns for breast self-examination (BSE). Experiment 1 compared the commonly taught concentric circles (CC) pattern to a new pattern composed of vertical strips (VS). Experiment 2 compared a radial spoke (RS) pattern to the VS pattern. Twenty-eight female subjects participated in each experiment. Each learned BSE and was post-tested using the two patterns under investigation; order of presentation was counterbalanced. BSE thoroughness was measured with the aid of a numbered grid projected on the subject's chest allowing an observer to mark each square of the grid palpated on a congruently gridded scoresheet. The percentage of the cone of the breast and of the totality of the breast tissue examined was calculated for each exam. Experiment 1 showed that the VS pattern engendered more thorough coverage of the total breast area (64.4% vs. 38.9%) and of the cone (64.1% vs. 48.7%). The results of Experiment 2 were similar: the VS pattern produced more thorough coverage of the total area (67.9% vs. 44.7%) and of the cone (70.3% vs. 57.2%). All differences were statistically reliable. Of 112 intrasubject comparisons involving the VS pattern, it produced more thorough coverage in all but nine. These results indicate that the VS pattern is the pattern of choice for maximally effective BSE.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3768844     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861201)58:11<2531::aid-cncr2820581128>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Relative effectiveness of methods of breast self-examination.

Authors:  E Atkins; L J Solomon; J K Worden; R S Foster
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1991-08

2.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Clinical breast examination.

Authors:  W H Goodson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-04

4.  How do women compare with internal medicine residents in breast lump detection? A study with silicone models.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; C A Pilgrim; J J Gonzalez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The effects of an instructional audiotape on breast self-examination proficiency.

Authors:  J A Jones; L E Eckhardt; J A Mayer; S Bartholomew; V L Malcarne; M F Hovell; J P Elder
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1993-04

6.  Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.

Authors:  Mahesh Sultania; Kamal Kataria; Anurag Srivastava; Mahesh Chandra Misra; Rajinder Parshad; Anita Dhar; Smriti Hari; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Pilgrim; C Lannon; R P Harris; W Cogburn; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Effects of cognitive style and maintenance strategies on breast self-examination (BSE) practice by African American women.

Authors:  T C Jacob; N E Penn; J A Kulik; L E Spieth
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-12

10.  The need and value of breast self-examination.

Authors:  T C Jacob; N E Penn
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.