Literature DB >> 7749049

Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90.

M J Reeves1, P A Newcomb, P L Remington, P M Marcus.   

Abstract

Early detection is advocated widely as the best method to reduce the high rate of breast cancer mortality in women. The purpose of this study was to describe the detection histories of women with breast cancer and to identify factors related to the method of detection. During the period 1988-90, 3,197 women with invasive breast cancer, identified through the Wisconsin (United States) tumor registry, were interviewed. The method of cancer detection (classified as self, screening mammography, or clinical breast examination [CBE]) was analyzed using polychotomous logistic regression. Fifty-five percent (1,754/3,197) of the women found their own cancers, while 35 percent (1,122/3,197) were detected by screening mammography. Compared with self-detection, the likelihood of non-localized disease was significantly lower for tumors detected by mammography (odds ratio [OR] = 0.3, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.2-0.4) and CBE (OR = 0.6, CI = 0.4-0.7). The likelihood of cancer being detected by screening mammography increased with increasing age, education, number of prior mammograms, family history, and body mass index (weight/height2) (BMI). Women in the highest BMI quintile were 2.3 times (CI = 1.7-3.0) more likely than women in the lowest BMI quintile to have their cancers diagnosed by mammography. This association most likely results from breast tumors being more difficult to palpate in heavier women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7749049     DOI: 10.1007/BF00052770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  26 in total

1.  Identifying women who have never had a mammogram.

Authors:  P M Lantz; P L Remington; E Cautley
Journal:  Wis Med J       Date:  1991-10

2.  Trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Relative weight and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women.

Authors:  W C Willett; M L Browne; C Bain; R J Lipnick; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; G A Colditz; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Behavioral and biological determinants of surgical stage of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Gould-Martin; A Paganini-Hill; C Casagrande; T Mack; R K Ross
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kaplan; G B Weinberg; A Small; J L Herndon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  R S Foster; M C Costanza
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Krischer; B Cook; R S Weiner
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1988

10.  The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors:  D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  11 in total

1.  Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90.

Authors:  K Nasseri
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Clinical breast examination.

Authors:  W H Goodson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-04

3.  Recent oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (United States)

Authors:  P A Newcomb; M P Longnecker; B E Storer; R Mittendorf; J Baron; R W Clapp; A Trentham-Dietz; W C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Self-detection remains a key method of breast cancer detection for U.S. women.

Authors:  Mara Y Roth; Joann G Elmore; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Lisa M Reisch; Natalia V Oster; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Symptomatic Breast Cancer Awareness despite a Recent Screen: The Role of Tumor Biology and Mammography Facility Characteristics.

Authors:  Mylove Mortel; Garth H Rauscher; Anne Marie Murphy; Kent Hoskins; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Linn Abraham; R James Brenner; Patricia A Carney; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Diana S M Buist; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  BREASTAID: Clinical results from early development of a clinical decision rule for palpable solid breast masses.

Authors:  Janet Rose Osuch; Mathew J Reeves; Dorothy R Pathak; Tosca Kinchelow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Wisconsin's health department-university partnership model for comprehensive cancer control.

Authors:  Kim Treml; Amy Ellestad Conlon; Mark V Wegner; Mary Baliker; Patrick Remington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Epidemiology of in situ and invasive breast cancer in women aged under 45.

Authors:  H A Weiss; L A Brinton; D Brogan; R J Coates; M D Gammon; K E Malone; J B Schoenberg; C A Swanson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.