Literature DB >> 8731002

Misclassification of smoking habits as a source of bias in the study of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.

P N Lee1, B A Forey.   

Abstract

The relationship of environmental tobacco smoke to lung cancer risk in lifelong non-smokers is commonly studied using marriage to a smoker as the index of exposure. As smokers tend to marry smokers, relative risk estimates will be biased if some current or former smokers are misclassified as lifelong non-smokers. This paper shows how various factors affect the magnitude of the bias and describes a method for obtaining misclassification-adjusted relative risk estimates. Application of the method to U.S. and Asian data for women suggests misclassification is an important determinant of the slight excess risk observed in non-smokers married to smokers. Reasons why our conclusions differ from those of others are discussed, as are other difficulties in interpreting the association between spousal smoking and lung cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8731002     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<581::AID-SIM182>3.0.CO;2-B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Effect of passive smoking on health.

Authors:  George Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-17

Review 2.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers.

Authors:  A J Wells; P B English; S F Posner; L E Wagenknecht; E J Perez-Stable
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?

Authors:  G D Smith; A N Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-12

5.  Complex segregation analysis reveals a multigene model for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hongyan Xu; Margaret R Spitz; Christopher I Amos; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  E Yano
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Exposure misclassification bias in studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.

Authors:  A H Wu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Indirectly estimated absolute lung cancer mortality rates by smoking status and histological type based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Barbara A Forey
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke from husband more strongly impacts on the airway obstruction of nonsmoking women.

Authors:  Kazuaki Suyama; Ryo Kozu; Takako Tanaka; Yuji Ishimatsu; Terumitsu Sawai
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2017-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.