Literature DB >> 10592145

Exposure misclassification bias in studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.

A H Wu1.   

Abstract

It is now recognized that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the workplace and other settings outside the home may be equally as important as residential ETS exposure. This review examines the sources of misclassification in the assessment of workplace ETS exposure in questionnaire-based epidemiologic studies. Cogent to this discussion is the role of misclassification of ever smokers as never smokers, which is important in studies of both workplace and residential ETS exposure and lung cancer and is discussed first. The collective evidence from studies that have used direct or indirect approaches to estimate smoker misclassification shows that although some misclassification of ever smokers as never smokers exists in studies of ETS and lung cancer, the potential bias from the misclassification of smokers is unlikely to explain the observed increased risk of lung cancer associated with ETS exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10592145      PMCID: PMC1566193          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s6873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  46 in total

1.  Does breathing other people's tobacco smoke cause lung cancer?

Authors:  N J Wald; K Nanchahal; S G Thompson; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-08

2.  Use of serum cotinine to assess the accuracy of self reported non-smoking.

Authors:  J E Haddow; G E Palomaki; G J Knight
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-15

3.  Passive smoking and lung cancer among Japanese women.

Authors:  S Akiba; H Kato; W J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Involuntary smoking and lung cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  L Garfinkel; O Auerbach; L Joubert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Validation of studies on lung cancer in non-smokers married to smokers.

Authors:  N Wald; C Ritchie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  A K Hackshaw; M R Law; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-18

7.  Smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer in women.

Authors:  A H Wu; B E Henderson; M C Pike; M C Yu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Carboxyhemoglobin, cotinine, and thiocyanate assay compared for distinguishing smokers from non-smokers.

Authors:  R Pojer; J B Whitfield; V Poulos; I F Eckhard; R Richmond; W J Hensley
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Nicotine concentrations in urine and saliva of smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  C Feyerabend; T Higenbottam; M A Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

10.  Relationship of passive smoking to risk of lung cancer and other smoking-associated diseases.

Authors:  P N Lee; J Chamberlain; M R Alderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Erika Avila-Tang; Paolo Boffetta; Lindsay M Hannan; Susan Olivo-Marston; Michael J Thun; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Myths, facts and conditional truths: what is the evidence on the risks associated with smoking in cars carrying children?

Authors:  Ray Pawson; Geoff Wong; Lesley Owen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  E Yano
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Is maternal employment site a source of exposure misclassification in studies of environmental exposures and birth outcomes? A simulation-based bias analysis of haloacetic acids in tap water and hypospadias.

Authors:  Ibrahim Zaganjor; Alexander P Keil; Thomas J Luben; Tania A Desrosiers; Lawrence S Engel; Jennita Reefhuis; Adrian M Michalski; Peter H Langlois; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Variants in inflammation genes are implicated in risk of lung cancer in never smokers exposed to second-hand smoke.

Authors:  Margaret R Spitz; Ivan P Gorlov; Christopher I Amos; Qiong Dong; Wei Chen; Carol J Etzel; Olga Y Gorlova; David W Chang; Xia Pu; Di Zhang; Liang Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Ping Yang; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Summary: workshop on health risks attributable to ETS exposure in the workplace.

Authors:  M S Jaakkola; J M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke from husband more strongly impacts on the airway obstruction of nonsmoking women.

Authors:  Kazuaki Suyama; Ryo Kozu; Takako Tanaka; Yuji Ishimatsu; Terumitsu Sawai
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2017-12-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.