OBJECTIVES: This paper provides misclassification rates for current cigarette smokers who report themselves as nonsmokers. Such rates are important in determining smoker misclassification bias in the estimation of relative risks in passive smoking studies. METHODS: True smoking status, either occasional or regular, was determined for individual current smokers in 3 existing studies of nonsmokers by inspecting the cotinine levels of body fluids. The new data, combined with an approximately equal amount in the 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on passive smoking and lung cancer, yielded misclassification rates that not only had lower standard errors but also were stratified by sex and US minority majority status. RESULTS: The misclassification rates for the important category of female smokers misclassified as never smokers were, respectively, 0.8%, 6.0%, 2.8%, and 15.3% for majority regular, majority occasional, US minority regular, and US minority occasional smokers. Misclassification rates for males were mostly somewhat higher. CONCLUSIONS: The new information supports EPA's conclusion that smoker misclassification bias is small. Also, investigators are advised to pay attention to minority/majority status of cohorts when correcting for smoker misclassification bias.
OBJECTIVES: This paper provides misclassification rates for current cigarette smokers who report themselves as nonsmokers. Such rates are important in determining smoker misclassification bias in the estimation of relative risks in passive smoking studies. METHODS: True smoking status, either occasional or regular, was determined for individual current smokers in 3 existing studies of nonsmokers by inspecting the cotinine levels of body fluids. The new data, combined with an approximately equal amount in the 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on passive smoking and lung cancer, yielded misclassification rates that not only had lower standard errors but also were stratified by sex and US minority majority status. RESULTS: The misclassification rates for the important category of female smokers misclassified as never smokers were, respectively, 0.8%, 6.0%, 2.8%, and 15.3% for majority regular, majority occasional, US minority regular, and US minority occasional smokers. Misclassification rates for males were mostly somewhat higher. CONCLUSIONS: The new information supports EPA's conclusion that smoker misclassification bias is small. Also, investigators are advised to pay attention to minority/majority status of cohorts when correcting for smoker misclassification bias.
Authors: E Riboli; S Preston-Martin; R Saracci; N J Haley; D Trichopoulos; H Becher; J D Burch; E T Fontham; Y T Gao; S K Jindal Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: L E Wagenknecht; G R Cutter; N J Haley; S Sidney; T A Manolio; G H Hughes; D R Jacobs Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1990-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yael Strulovici-Barel; Larsson Omberg; Michael O'Mahony; Cynthia Gordon; Charleen Hollmann; Ann E Tilley; Jacqueline Salit; Jason Mezey; Ben-Gary Harvey; Ronald G Crystal Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robert A Meguid; Craig M Hooker; James Harris; Li Xu; William H Westra; J Timothy Sherwood; Marc Sussman; Stephen M Cattaneo; James Shin; Solange Cox; Joani Christensen; Yelena Prints; Nance Yuan; Jennifer Zhang; Stephen C Yang; Malcolm V Brock Journal: Chest Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Scarlett L Gomez; Ellen T Chang; Sarah J Shema; Kari Fish; Jennette D Sison; Peggy Reynolds; Christelle Clément-Duchêne; Margaret R Wrensch; John L Wiencke; Heather A Wakelee Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 4.254