Literature DB >> 8727822

Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region.

C Cedzich1, M Taniguchi, S Schäfer, J Schramm.   

Abstract

In 99 patients with mass lesions in and around the central region, the central sulcus was intraoperatively localized with the use of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) phase reversal. In 33 of these patients, the motor cortex was directly stimulated and electromyographic responses were recorded from the forearm flexor, thenar, and hypothenar muscles. An additional 25 patients, with subcortical lesions or lesions directly located at the pyramidal tract, were continuously monitored during surgery by motor evoked potentials (MEPs). An exact determination of the central sulcus and tumor localization was possible in all patients; a phase reversal was obtained in 90.8% of the patients, and localization was possible as a result of anatomic structures and the loss of N20 or P20 of SEPs in the other 9.2%. MEPs were obtained in 32 of 33 patients and also in all 25 patients who underwent MEP monitoring at the beginning of tumor removal. From this study, it can be concluded that the combination of SEP phase reversal and modified electrical cortex stimulation is compatible with general anesthesia, although anesthesia was not systematically controlled according to a protocol. Although this study demonstrates that the combined SEP/MEP technique was feasible, it is not yet possible to demonstrate benefit in improving the outcome of patients. Concerning the safety of stimulation, the exact localization of the central sulcus by the noninvasive SEP method, compared with direct electrical stimulation, offered more safety for the patient. The modified technique of direct motor cortex stimulation needed much less charge density than did the common technique. The recording of electromyographic responses instead of movements made objective documentation possible, and the analysis of amplitudes and latencies will supply quantitative information about the motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8727822     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  43 in total

1.  Metabolic and electrophysiological validation of functional MRI.

Authors:  T Krings; M Schreckenberger; V Rohde; H Foltys; U Spetzger; O Sabri; M H Reinges; S Kemeny; P T Meyer; W Möller-Hartmann; M Korinth; J M Gilsbach; U Buell; A Thron
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation.

Authors:  H Duffau; L Capelle; D Denvil; N Sichez; P Gatignol; M Lopes; M-C Mitchell; J-P Sichez; R Van Effenterre
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity.

Authors:  Thomas J Oxley; Nicholas L Opie; Sam E John; Gil S Rind; Stephen M Ronayne; Tracey L Wheeler; Jack W Judy; Alan J McDonald; Anthony Dornom; Timothy J H Lovell; Christopher Steward; David J Garrett; Bradford A Moffat; Elaine H Lui; Nawaf Yassi; Bruce C V Campbell; Yan T Wong; Kate E Fox; Ewan S Nurse; Iwan E Bennett; Sébastien H Bauquier; Kishan A Liyanage; Nicole R van der Nagel; Piero Perucca; Arman Ahnood; Katherine P Gill; Bernard Yan; Leonid Churilov; Christopher R French; Patricia M Desmond; Malcolm K Horne; Lynette Kiers; Steven Prawer; Stephen M Davis; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Mitchell; David B Grayden; Clive N May; Terence J O'Brien
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor.

Authors:  Enrico Opri; Stephanie Cernera; Rene Molina; Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Leonardo Almeida; Timothy Denison; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations.

Authors:  M R Weinzierl; P Reinacher; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Listening to the brain: new techniques in intraoperative brain mapping.

Authors:  Eric C Leuthardt; Jarod Roland; Jonathan Breshears; S Kathleen Bandt; Joshua S Shimony
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Brainstem origins of the n18 component of the somatosensory evoked response.

Authors:  M Philips; M Kotapka; T Patterson; D C Bigelow; E Zager; E S Flamm; M Stecker
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

8.  Stereotactic iodine-125 brachytherapy for the treatment of WHO grades II and III gliomas located in the central sulcus region.

Authors:  Maximilian I Ruge; Philipp Kickingereder; Stefan Grau; Franziska Dorn; Norbert Galldiks; Harald Treuer; Volker Sturm
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Applications of neural and mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  Thomas Kosztowski; Hasan A Zaidi; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.512

10.  Focused high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for localisation of the unexposed primary motor cortex during brain tumour surgery.

Authors:  V Rohde; L Mayfrank; M Weinzierl; T Krings; J M Gilsbach
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.