Literature DB >> 12933937

Focused high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for localisation of the unexposed primary motor cortex during brain tumour surgery.

V Rohde1, L Mayfrank, M Weinzierl, T Krings, J M Gilsbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if intraoperative focused high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can localise the primary motor cortex without exposure of the cortical surface.
METHODS: A high frequency train (357 Hz) of four suprathreshold magnetic stimuli was delivered transcranially to the region of the rolandic area during brain tumour operations in 12 patients. To induce a focal magnetoelectric field, the flat figure of eight coil (outer diameter of each loop 7 cm) was used. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded in eight muscles of the upper and lower contralateral extremities. The first stimulation site was 2.5 cm behind the bregma, the second site 2 cm, and the third site 4 cm dorsal to the first stimulation site. If no MEP were obtainable, stimulation was repeated in anteroposterior direction at more laterally located sites. Using neuronavigation, each positive stimulation site was correlated with the underlying cortical anatomy.
RESULTS: Stimulation was performed at a total of 42 sites (in two patients, maximum stimulation at the three initial sites failed to evoke a motor response). In four patients, MEP were obtained only from one stimulation site. This site exactly overlayed the primary motor cortex. In eight patients, MEP could be elicited from more than one stimulation site. In seven of the eight patients, the site from which MEP with peak amplitudes were elicited, corresponded to the primary motor cortex. In total, the primary motor cortex was correctly identified on the basis of electrophysiological findings in 11 of 12 patients (92 %). In two patients, only the more lateral stimulation sites permitted MEP recording.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative focused rTMS is highly sensitive for localisation of the primary motor cortex. Focused rTMS as a localising instrument alleviates the need of motor cortex exposure and, thereby, can contribute to minimise the surgical approach to brain tumours in the rolandic area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933937      PMCID: PMC1738666          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  30 in total

1.  Presurgical motor and somatosensory cortex mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  R G Bittar; A Olivier; A F Sadikot; F Andermann; G B Pike; D C Reutens
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies.

Authors:  T Krings; M H Reinges; S Erberich; S Kemeny; V Rohde; U Spetzger; M Korinth; K Willmes; J M Gilsbach; A Thron
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations.

Authors:  L G Cohen; B J Roth; J Nilsson; N Dang; M Panizza; S Bandinelli; W Friauf; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04

4.  Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray; T N Schriefer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  B L Day; P D Thompson; J P Dick; K Nakashima; C D Marsden
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-03-20       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Abnormalities in central motor pathway conduction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J M Cowan; J C Rothwell; J P Dick; P D Thompson; B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical evaluation of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of human brain.

Authors:  A T Barker; I L Freeston; R Jabinous; J A Jarratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.

Authors:  A T Barker; R Jalinous; I L Freeston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Virtual pointer projection of the central sulcus to the outside of the skull using frameless neuronavigation -- accuracy and applications.

Authors:  M H Reinges; T Krings; H H Nguyen; W Küker; U Spetzger; V Rohde; B O Hütter; A Thron; J M Gilsbach
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for presurgical planning--correlation with functional MRI.

Authors:  T Krings; H Foltys; M H Reinges; S Kemeny; V Rohde; U Spetzger; J M Gilsbach; A Thron
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2001-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Capabilities of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Aid in the Removal of Brain Tumors Affecting the Motor Cortex: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucas Jose Vaz Schiavao; Iuri Neville Ribeiro; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Gabriel Pokorny; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.