Literature DB >> 11723198

Metabolic and electrophysiological validation of functional MRI.

T Krings1, M Schreckenberger, V Rohde, H Foltys, U Spetzger, O Sabri, M H Reinges, S Kemeny, P T Meyer, W Möller-Hartmann, M Korinth, J M Gilsbach, U Buell, A Thron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although functional MRI is widely used for preoperative planning and intraoperative neuronavigation, its accuracy to depict the site of neuronal activity is not exactly known. Experience with methods that may validate fMRI data and the results obtained when coregistering fMRI with different preoperative and intraoperative mapping modalities including metabolically based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, electrophysiologcally based transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS) are described.
METHODS: Fifty patients were included. PET was performed in 30, TMS in 10, and DECS in 41 patients. After coregistration using a frameless stereotactic system, results were grouped into overlapping (<1 cm distance), neighbouring (<2 cm), or contradictory (>2 cm).
RESULTS: Comparing fMRI with PET, 18 overlapping, seven neighbouring, and one contradictory result were obtained. In four patients no comparison was possible (because of motion artefacts, low signal to noise ratio, and unusual high tumour metabolism in PET). The comparison of TMS and fMRI showed seven overlapping and three neighbouring results. In three patients no DECS results could be obtained. Of the remaining 38 patients, fMRI hand motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the upper limb muscles in 36 patients, and fMRI foot motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the lower limb on 13 occasions. Of those 49 studies, overlapping results were obtained in 31 patients, and neighbouring in 14. On four occasions fMRI did not show functional information (because of motion artefacts and low signal to noise).
CONCLUSIONS: All validation techniques have intrinsic limitations that restrict their spatial resolution. However, of 50 investigated patients, there was only one in whom results contradictory to fMRI were obtained. Although it is not thought that fMRI can replace the intraoperatively updated functional information (DECS), it is concluded that fMRI is an important adjunct in the preoperative assessment of patients with tumours in the vicinity of the central region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11723198      PMCID: PMC1737624          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  49 in total

1.  Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.

Authors:  R J Nudo; B M Wise; F SiFuentes; G W Milliken
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region.

Authors:  C Cedzich; M Taniguchi; S Schäfer; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Effects of stimulus rate on regional cerebral blood flow after median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  V Ibáñez; M P Deiber; N Sadato; C Toro; J Grissom; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging.

Authors:  K K Kwong
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1995-03

5.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of sensory and motor cortex: comparison with electrophysiological localization.

Authors:  A Puce; R T Constable; M L Luby; G McCarthy; A C Nobre; D D Spencer; J C Gore; T Allison
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Assessment of cortical motor output: compound muscle action potential versus twitch force recording.

Authors:  L Kiers; P Clouston; K H Chiappa; D Cros
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04

7.  fMRI: does correlation imply activation?

Authors:  J V Hajnal; G M Bydder; I R Young
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Brain or vein--oxygenation or flow? On signal physiology in functional MRI of human brain activation.

Authors:  J Frahm; K D Merboldt; W Hänicke; A Kleinschmidt; H Boecker
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies.

Authors:  U Pietrzyk; K Herholz; G Fink; A Jacobs; R Mielke; I Slansky; M Würker; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Optimal cutoff levels of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the differentiation of low-grade from high-grade brain tumors with PET.

Authors:  D Delbeke; C Meyerowitz; R L Lapidus; R J Maciunas; M T Jennings; P L Moots; R M Kessler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluating requirements for spatial resolution of fMRI for neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  Seung-Schik Yoo; Ion-Florin Talos; Alexandra J Golby; Peter McL Black; Lawrence P Panych
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  [Physiological and technical limitations of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)--consequences for clinical use].

Authors:  T Wüstenberg; K Jordan; F L Giesel; A Villringer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Reproducibility of functional MR imaging results using two different MR systems.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Vlieger; Cristina Lavini; Charles B Majoie; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Lorie G Richards; Kim C Stewart; Michelle L Woodbury; Claudia Senesac; James H Cauraugh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Quantitative comparison of functional MRI and direct electrocortical stimulation for functional mapping.

Authors:  S Larsen; R Kikinis; I-F Talos; D Weinstein; W Wells; A Golby
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 6.  [Clinical application of functional MRI for chronic epilepsy].

Authors:  F G Woermann; K Labudda
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Rater-dependent accuracy in predicting the spatial location of functional centers on anatomical MR images.

Authors:  Hillary K Rolls; Seung-Schik Yoo; Kelly H Zou; Alexandra J Golby; Lawrence P Panych
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgical planning in neurooncology.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Vlieger; Charles B Majoie; Sieger Leenstra; Gerard J Den Heeten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Adam D Waldman; Alan Jackson; Stephen J Price; Christopher A Clark; Thomas C Booth; Dorothee P Auer; Paul S Tofts; David J Collins; Martin O Leach; Jeremy H Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Effect of disease and recovery on functional anatomy in brain tumor patients: insights from functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Emam Saleh; Raymond Y Huang; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2013-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.