Literature DB >> 8725190

The relaxivity of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA in liver and kidney of the Wistar rat.

B Shuter1, P S Tofts, S C Wang, J M Pope.   

Abstract

The NMR relaxivities of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA were determined in the kidney and liver of intact male Wistar rats immediately following sacrifice and in vitro in solutions and gels, at 1.5 T using a clinical MR scanner, T1 and T2 values of tissue samples were derived from spin-echo image sequences. Tissue gadolinium concentrations were determined by radioassay of Gd153, Gd-EOB-DTPA T1 and T2 relaxivities, R1 and R2 (s-1 mmole-1 kg), were found to be 10.7 +/- 0.5 and 22.5 +/- 3.2 respectively, for liver, 2.4 +/- 0.2 and 12.1 +/- 1.7 for kidney cortex, 2.7 +/- 0.2 and 14.5 +/- 1.9 for kidney outer medulla, 2.0 +/- 0.2 and 11.4 +/- 2.1 for kidney inner medulla. Gd-DTPA R1 and R2 were found to be 4.8 +/- 0.4 and 14.5 +/- 3.7 for liver, 1.2 +/- 0.1 and 7.9 +/- 0.8 for kidney cortex, 1.6 +/- 0.1 and 10.2 +/- 1.4 for kidney outer medulla, 1.3 +/- 0.1 and 10.2 +/- 1.2 for kidney inner medulla. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA R1 was increased in liver compared to agarose gets at 38 degrees C (4.49 +/- 0.03 and 3.47 +/- 0.06), but reduced in kidney tissues. All R2 were elevated compared to agarose gels at 38 degrees C (5.72 +/- 0.12 and 4.12 +/- 0.03). Elevated R2 and R1 (expressed in terms of the concentration of gadolinium per kg of tissue) can be accounted for in part by the lower water content of tissues compared with gels or solutions increased microviscosity and binding to macromolecules. In addition, susceptibility effects may give rise to further increases in R2. By contrast, the reduced R1 observed in kidney may be the result of compartmentalization of the magnetopharmaceuticals. Statistically improved fits were obtained for T1 recovery curves for liver in the presence of Gd-EOB-DTPA when a dual exponential model was used. Assuming in vitro values for the relaxivities of these artificial contrast agents will lead to inaccuracies when relating observed signal enhancement factors to tissue gadolinium concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8725190     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(95)02097-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  11 in total

1.  Effect of gadolinium on hepatic fat quantification using multi-echo reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation.

Authors:  Mingmei Ge; Jing Zhang; Bing Wu; Zhiqin Liu; Hai Song; Xiangfeng Meng; Xinhuai Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images to assess renal function.

Authors:  N Michoux; J-P Vallée; A Pechère-Bertschi; X Montet; L Buehler; B E Van Beers
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Precise measurement of renal filtration and vascular parameters using a two-compartment model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the kidney gives realistic normal values.

Authors:  Paul S Tofts; Marica Cutajar; Iosif A Mendichovszky; A Michael Peters; Isky Gordon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Acute impairment of rat renal function by L -NAME as measured using dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Farid Sari-Sarraf; Silvia Pomposiello; Didier Laurent
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Functional MRI of the kidneys.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters independent of baseline T10 values.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Guo; Wilburn E Reddick; Mark A Rosen; Hee Kwon Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Consensus report of the 4th International Forum for Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Min Lee; Christoph J Zech; Luigi Bolondi; Eduard Jonas; Myeong-Jin Kim; Osamu Matsui; Elmar M Merkle; Michiie Sakamoto; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to measure subtle blood-brain barrier abnormalities.

Authors:  Paul A Armitage; Andrew J Farrall; Trevor K Carpenter; Fergus N Doubal; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Model-inferred mechanisms of liver function from magnetic resonance imaging data: Validation and variation across a clinically relevant cohort.

Authors:  Mikael F Forsgren; Markus Karlsson; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Nils Dahlström; Bengt Norén; Thobias Romu; Simone Ignatova; Mattias Ekstedt; Stergios Kechagias; Peter Lundberg; Gunnar Cedersund
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Physiologically realistic and validated mathematical liver model reveals [corrected] hepatobiliary transfer rates for Gd-EOB-DTPA using human DCE-MRI data.

Authors:  Mikael Fredrik Forsgren; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Nils Dahlström; Gunnar Cedersund; Peter Lundberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.