Literature DB >> 19559556

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters independent of baseline T10 values.

Jun-Yu Guo1, Wilburn E Reddick, Mark A Rosen, Hee Kwon Song.   

Abstract

A baseline T(10) value is typically needed for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI studies. However, an assumed baseline T(10) has to be used when T(10) measurements for patients are not available. In this work, we systematically investigate the dependence on T(10) of the commonly used DCE-MRI parameters (K(trans), k(ep), v(e) and IAUC) as well as several newly defined parameters [the normalized ratios (NRs) of k(ep), K(trans) and v(e), which are measures of relative changes in these parameters between two time points] for a spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence using simulations and in vivo studies. Effects of various factors on the T(10) dependence, such as the true T(10) value, flip angle and the potential changes in T(10) due to treatment, were also assessed using simulations. We found that DCE-MRI parameters k(ep) and the NR of k(ep) are largely independent of T(10), especially when larger flip angles are used (e.g., 30-40 degrees). Their estimations therefore do not require any knowledge of T(10). The NRs of K(trans), v(e) and IAUC also exhibit independence to T(10), but only when T(10) remains constant between pre- and posttreatment. The estimation of parameters themselves (K(trans), v(e) and IAUC) is highly dependent on the T(10) value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19559556      PMCID: PMC2763042          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  32 in total

1.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors.

Authors:  K L Li; X P Zhu; J Waterton; A Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Brian M Dale; John A Jesberger; Jonathan S Lewin; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Optimized precision of inversion-recovery T1 measurements for constrained scan time.

Authors:  Robert J Ogg; Peter B Kingsley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of regional contrast access as an additional prognostic factor in pediatric osteosarcoma.

Authors:  W E Reddick; S Wang; X Xiong; J O Glass; S Wu; S C Kaste; C B Pratt; W H Meyer; B D Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  MRI measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability following spontaneous reperfusion in the starch microsphere model of ischemia.

Authors:  Neil G Harris; Victoria Gauden; Paul A Fraser; Stephen R Williams; Geoff J M Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade.

Authors:  H C Roberts; T P Roberts; R C Brasch; W P Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.966

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pixel-by-Pixel Comparison of Volume Transfer Constant and Estimates of Cerebral Blood Volume from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in High-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  P Alcaide-Leon; D Pareto; E Martinez-Saez; C Auger; A Bharatha; A Rovira
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The impact of reliable prebolus T 1 measurements or a fixed T 1 value in the assessment of glioma patients with dynamic contrast enhancing MRI.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Kim Mouridsen; Irene Klærke Mikkelsen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in predicting event-free and overall survival in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Junyu Guo; Wilburn E Reddick; John O Glass; Qing Ji; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Fredric A Hoffer; Sue C Kaste; Jesse J Jenkins; Ximena C Ortega Flores; Juan Quintana; Milena Villarroel; Najat C Daw
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived microvascular permeability in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; Benedikt Wiestler; Markus Graf; Sabine Heiland; Heinz Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Antje Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Quantitative analysis of clinical dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for evaluating treatment response in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanming Yu; Quan Jiang; Yanwei Miao; Jun Li; Shanglian Bao; Haoyu Wang; Chunxue Wu; Xiaoying Wang; Jiong Zhu; Yi Zhong; E Mark Haacke; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Quantitative multiparametric MRI of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jori S Carter; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Jessica E Kuehn-Hajder; Gregory J Metzger; Navneeth Lakkadi; Levi S Downs; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?

Authors:  Nicole Wake; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Koji Fujimoto; Linda Moy; Daniel K Sodickson; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Low-Grade Versus Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas.

Authors:  Julio Arevalo-Perez; Amanuel A Kebede; Kyung K Peck; Eli Diamond; Andrei I Holodny; Marc Rosenblum; Jennifer Rubel; Joshua Gaal; Vaios Hatzoglou
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.486

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.