Mingmei Ge1, Jing Zhang2, Bing Wu1, Zhiqin Liu1, Hai Song1, Xiangfeng Meng1, Xinhuai Wu3. 1. Department of Radiology, The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA, #5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. 2. Department of Radiology, The 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Radiology, The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA, #5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. wuxinhuai_100700@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hepatic fat quantification is affected by administration of gadolinium using a multiecho reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent the investigational sequence for hepatic fat quantification at 3.0T MRI once before and twice after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with pairwise comparisons was conducted to evaluate the systematic bias of fat fraction (FF) and R2* measurements between three acquisitions. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreements between pre- and post-contrast FF measurements in the liver. A P value <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference. RESULTS: FF measurements of liver, spleen and spine revealed no significant systematic bias between the three measurements (P > 0.05 for all). Good agreements (95 % confidence interval) of FF measurements were demonstrated between pre-contrast and post-contrast1 (-0.49 %, 0.52 %) and post-contrast2 (-0.83 %, 0.77 %). R2* increased in liver and spleen (P = 0.039, P = 0.01) after administration of gadolinium. CONCLUSIONS: Although under the impact of an increased R2* in liver and spleen post-contrast, the investigational sequence can still obtain stable fat quantification. Therefore, it could be applied post-contrast to substantially increase the efficiency of MR examination and also provide a backup for the occasional failure of FF measurements pre-contrast. KEY POINTS: • Fat quantification with IDEAL-based investigational sequence remains stable after gadolinium administration. • It can be integrated into tri-phase liver MRI without adding scan time. • This helps optimize MR protocols and provides more useful information for clinicians.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hepatic fat quantification is affected by administration of gadolinium using a multiecho reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent the investigational sequence for hepatic fat quantification at 3.0T MRI once before and twice after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with pairwise comparisons was conducted to evaluate the systematic bias of fat fraction (FF) and R2* measurements between three acquisitions. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreements between pre- and post-contrast FF measurements in the liver. A P value <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference. RESULTS: FF measurements of liver, spleen and spine revealed no significant systematic bias between the three measurements (P > 0.05 for all). Good agreements (95 % confidence interval) of FF measurements were demonstrated between pre-contrast and post-contrast1 (-0.49 %, 0.52 %) and post-contrast2 (-0.83 %, 0.77 %). R2* increased in liver and spleen (P = 0.039, P = 0.01) after administration of gadolinium. CONCLUSIONS: Although under the impact of an increased R2* in liver and spleen post-contrast, the investigational sequence can still obtain stable fat quantification. Therefore, it could be applied post-contrast to substantially increase the efficiency of MR examination and also provide a backup for the occasional failure of FF measurements pre-contrast. KEY POINTS: • Fat quantification with IDEAL-based investigational sequence remains stable after gadolinium administration. • It can be integrated into tri-phase liver MRI without adding scan time. • This helps optimize MR protocols and provides more useful information for clinicians.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: B Henninger; H Zoller; S Rauch; M Schocke; S Kannengiesser; X Zhong; G Reiter; W Jaschke; C Kremser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: D K George; S Goldwurm; G A MacDonald; L L Cowley; N I Walker; P J Ward; E C Jazwinska; L W Powell Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105