Literature DB >> 26376885

Effect of gadolinium on hepatic fat quantification using multi-echo reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation.

Mingmei Ge1, Jing Zhang2, Bing Wu1, Zhiqin Liu1, Hai Song1, Xiangfeng Meng1, Xinhuai Wu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hepatic fat quantification is affected by administration of gadolinium using a multiecho reconstruction technique with T2* correction and estimation.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent the investigational sequence for hepatic fat quantification at 3.0T MRI once before and twice after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with pairwise comparisons was conducted to evaluate the systematic bias of fat fraction (FF) and R2* measurements between three acquisitions. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreements between pre- and post-contrast FF measurements in the liver. A P value <0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.
RESULTS: FF measurements of liver, spleen and spine revealed no significant systematic bias between the three measurements (P > 0.05 for all). Good agreements (95 % confidence interval) of FF measurements were demonstrated between pre-contrast and post-contrast1 (-0.49 %, 0.52 %) and post-contrast2 (-0.83 %, 0.77 %). R2* increased in liver and spleen (P = 0.039, P = 0.01) after administration of gadolinium.
CONCLUSIONS: Although under the impact of an increased R2* in liver and spleen post-contrast, the investigational sequence can still obtain stable fat quantification. Therefore, it could be applied post-contrast to substantially increase the efficiency of MR examination and also provide a backup for the occasional failure of FF measurements pre-contrast. KEY POINTS: • Fat quantification with IDEAL-based investigational sequence remains stable after gadolinium administration. • It can be integrated into tri-phase liver MRI without adding scan time. • This helps optimize MR protocols and provides more useful information for clinicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fat quantification; Gadopentetate dimeglumine; IDEAL; Multiecho reconstruction; T2* correction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26376885     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3981-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  33 in total

1.  Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging.

Authors:  G H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Magnetic resonance fat quantification in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  H-J Chiang; L-H Lin; C-W Li; C-C Lin; H-W Chiang; T-L Huang; C-L Chen; Y-F Cheng
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Focal sparing of iron and fat in liver tissue in patients with hemosiderosis: diagnosis with combination of R2* relaxometry and proton density fat fraction calculation by MRI.

Authors:  Muşturay Karçaaltincaba; Ilkay Idilman; Azim Celik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences.

Authors:  B Henninger; H Zoller; S Rauch; M Schocke; S Kannengiesser; X Zhong; G Reiter; W Jaschke; C Kremser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  W T Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-echo (in- and opposed-phase) T1-weighted gradient recalled echo for detection and grading of hepatic iron using quantitative and visual assessment.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; John Ryan; Maneesh Khanna; Vivek Virmani; Leonard Avruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Increased hepatic iron concentration in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with increased fibrosis.

Authors:  D K George; S Goldwurm; G A MacDonald; L L Cowley; N I Walker; P J Ward; E C Jazwinska; L W Powell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Iron in nonhemochromatotic liver disorders.

Authors:  Vamsee Alla; Herbert L Bonkovsky
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.115

10.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  How We Do It: Managing the Indeterminate Renal Mass with the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  Quantitative assessment of lumbar spine bone marrow in patients with different severity of CKD by IDEAL-IQ magnetic resonance sequence.

Authors:  Yan Xiong; Tongxiang He; Weiyin Vivian Liu; Yao Zhang; Shuang Hu; Donglin Wen; Yanan Wang; Peisen Zhang; Fan He; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.055

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.