Literature DB >> 8723457

Ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in burn patients.

J C Garrelts1, G Jost, S F Kowalsky, G J Krol, J T Lettieri.   

Abstract

Many drugs exhibit altered pharmacokinetic parameters in burn patients. We prospectively evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in eight burn patients with active infections. Each patient received a 400-mg dose of ciprofloxacin intravenously (i.v.) every 8 h, with each dose infused over 1 h by using a rate control device. Blood samples for analysis of plasma ciprofloxacin concentrations, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were obtained immediately predose, at the end of the infusion, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 h after the end of the infusion. Urine was collected from 0 to 2, 2 to 4, and 4 to 8 h following the same dose, and an aliquot was saved for determination of the ciprofloxacin concentration. Urine was also collected for 24 h prior to this dose for measurement of creatinine clearance (CLCR). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis. Mean maximum and minimum plasma ciprofloxacin concentrations were 4.2 +/- 1.1 and 0.70 +/- 0.55 microgram/ml, respectively. Mean values for clearance (CL), renal clearance (CLR), volume of distribution, terminal elimination rate constant, half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were 29.1 +/- 17.5 liters/h, 13.5 +/- 10.1 liters/h, 1.75 +/- 0.41 liters/kg, 0.222 +/- 0.098 h-1, 4.5 +/- 3.9 h, and 20.7 +/- 16.6 micrograms.h/ml, respectively. CL was higher and t1/2 was shorter than noted in previous studies of acutely ill, hospitalized patients. A good correlation was noted between creatinine clearance CL(CR) and both total ciprofloxacin CL (r = 0.85) and CLR (r = 0.84). A moderate inverse correlation was noted between percent body surface area burned and total ciprofloxacin CL (r = -0.55). An AUC/MIC ratio above 125 SIT-1 (where SIT is serum inhibitory titer), which has been strongly correlated with clinical response and time to bacterial eradication, was achieved in five of eight patients (63%) with a MIC of 0.25 microgram/ml. At a ciprofloxacin dosage of 400 mg i.v. every 12 h, an AUC/MIC ratio above 125 SIT-1 would have been achieved in only two of eight patients (25%). We conclude that ciprofloxacin CL is highly variable, but generally increased, in burn patients compared with that in acutely ill, general medical and surgical patients. Because of an increase in CL, a ciprofloxacin dosage of 400 mg i.v. every 8 h is more likely to produce the desired response in burn patients than the same dose given every 12 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723457      PMCID: PMC163282          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Infections in burn patients.

Authors:  A Luterman; C C Dacso; P W Curreri
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  HPLC analysis of ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin metabolites in body fluids.

Authors:  G J Krol; G W Beck; T Benham
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 3.  Pathophysiology and pharmacokinetics following burn injury.

Authors:  P L Bonate
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Burns.

Authors:  R H Demling
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics of systemically administered antibiotics in patients with thermal injury.

Authors:  B A Boucher; D A Kuhl; W L Hickerson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Comparative serum bactericidal activities of three doses of ciprofloxacin administered intravenously.

Authors:  M Dan; F Poch; C Quassem; R Kitzes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Development of a population pharmacokinetic model and optimal sampling strategies for intravenous ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  A Forrest; C H Ballow; D E Nix; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Prospective use of optimal sampling theory: steady-state ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill trauma patients.

Authors:  G J Yuen; G L Drusano; A Forrest; K Plaisance; E S Caplan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.875

  10 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.

Authors:  P S McKinnon; S L Davis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the newer fluoroquinolone antibacterials.

Authors:  A Aminimanizani; P Beringer; R Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with severe burn injury.

Authors:  Tyree H Kiser; Dorie W Hoody; Marilee D Obritsch; Colleen O Wegzyn; Paulus C Bauling; Douglas N Fish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and its penetration into bronchial secretions of mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Paschalina Kontou; Kalliopi Chatzika; Georgia Pitsiou; Ioannis Stanopoulos; Paraskevi Argyropoulou-Pataka; Ioannis Kioumis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Secretion of proteases by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Ewa Ołdak; Elzbieta A Trafny
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of Arbekacin in patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yusuke Tanigawara; Reiko Sato; Kunihiko Morita; Mitsuo Kaku; Naoki Aikawa; Kihachiro Shimizu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in burn and non-burn rabbits.

Authors:  Jian-Li Ma; Lei Gao; Xiang Li; Wan-Li Chu; Yong-Qiang Feng; Xiao-Qin Wang; Qing-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 10.  Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients.

Authors:  Benoit Blanchet; Vincent Jullien; Christophe Vinsonneau; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.