Literature DB >> 8517694

Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

A Forrest1, D E Nix, C H Ballow, T F Goss, M C Birmingham, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Seventy-four acutely ill patients were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin at dosages ranging between 200 mg every 12 h and 400 mg every 8 h. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis relating drug exposure (and other factors) to infectious outcome was performed. Plasma samples were obtained and assayed for ciprofloxacin by high-performance liquid chromatography. Samples from patients were frequently cultured so that the day of bacterial eradication could be determined. The pharmacokinetic data were fitted by iterative two-stage analysis, assuming a linear two-compartment model. Logistic regression was used to model ciprofloxacin exposure (and other potential covariates) versus the probabilities of achieving clinical and microbiologic cures. The same variables were also modelled versus the time to bacterial eradication by proportional hazards regression. The independent variables considered were dose, site of infection, infecting organism and the MIC for it, percent time above the MIC, peak, peak/MIC ratio, trough, trough/MIC ratio, 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), AUC/MIC ratio (AUIC), presence of other active antibacterial agents, and patient characteristics. The most important predictor for all three measures of ciprofloxacin pharmacodynamics was the AUIC. A 24-h AUIC of 125 SIT-1.h (inverse serum inhibitory titer integrated over time) was found to be a significant breakpoint for probabilities of both clinical and microbiologic cures. At an AUIC below 125 (19 patients), the percent probabilities of clinical and microbiologic cures were 42 and 26%, respectively. At an AUIC above 125 (45 patients), the probabilities were 80% (P < 0.005) and 82% (P < 0.001), respectively. There were two significant breakpoints in the time-to-bacterial-eradication data. At an AUIC below 125 (21 patients), the median time to eradication exceeded 32 days; at an AUIC of 125 to 250 (15 patients), time to eradication was 6.6 days: and at AUIC above 250 (28 patients), the median time to eradication was 1.9 days (groups differed; P < 0.005). These findings, when combined with pharmacokinetic data reported in the companion article, provide the rationale and tools needed for targeting the dosage of intravenous ciprofloxacin to individual patients' pharmacokinetics and their bacterial pathogens' susceptibilities. An a priori dosing algorithm (based on MIC, patient creatine clearance and weight, and the clinician-specified AUIC target) was developed. This approach was shown, retrospectively, to be more precise than current guidelines, and it can be used to achieve more rapid bacteriologic and clinical responses to ciprofloxacin, as a consequence of targeting the AUIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8517694      PMCID: PMC187901          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.37.5.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  32 in total

1.  Correlation of predicted serum bactericidal activities and values measured in volunteers.

Authors:  G Drusano; H Standiford; P Ryan; W McNamee; B Tatem; S Schimpff
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Liquid-chromatographic determination of ciprofloxacin in serum and urine.

Authors:  D E Nix; J M De Vito; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Analysis of a new method for assessing activity of combinations of antimicrobials: area under the bactericidal activity curve.

Authors:  S L Barriere; E Ely; J E Kapusnik; J G Gambertoglio
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Drug therapy. Serum bactericidal activity as a monitor of antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; M N Swartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, a new carboxyquinoline antimicrobial agent.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; A Gardella; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Role for dual individualization with cefmenoxime.

Authors:  J J Schentag; I L Smith; D J Swanson; C DeAngelis; J E Fracasso; A Vari; J W Vance
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Antibiotic therapy of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in normal and granulocytopenic mice: comparison of murine and human pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A U Gerber; H P Brugger; C Feller; T Stritzko; B Stalder
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus determined by the killing curve method: antibiotic comparisons and synergistic interactions.

Authors:  L J Chalkley; H J Koornhof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Correlation of serum bactericidal activity with antimicrobial agent level and minimal bactericidal concentration.

Authors:  C W Stratton; M P Weinstein; L B Reller
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Oral ciprofloxacin therapy of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  B E Scully; H C Neu; M F Parry; W Mandell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  262 in total

1.  Activity of moxifloxacin, administered once a day, against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of infection.

Authors:  A P MacGowan; K E Bowker; M Wootton; H A Holt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of infections. The role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials.

Authors:  R C Li; M Zhu; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Influence of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles on Antibiotic Selection.

Authors:  George G. Zhanel
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of linezolid following multiple oral doses.

Authors:  T Gee; R Ellis; G Marshall; J Andrews; J Ashby; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics and inflammatory-fluid penetration of moxifloxacin following oral or intravenous administration.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; G Marshall; G Hartman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  In vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacodynamics of new quinolones.

Authors:  A Dalhoff; F-J Schmitz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Activities of newer fluoroquinolones against ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  E A Coyle; G W Kaatz; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  P D Lister; C C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares.

Authors:  G R Haines; M P Brown; R R Gronwall; K A Merritt
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.310

10.  The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin.

Authors:  J T Sullivan; J T Lettieri; P Liu; A H Heller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.