Literature DB >> 8721152

Contribution of the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields to auditory orienting behavior in the barn owl.

E I Knudsen1, P F Knudsen.   

Abstract

A region in the barn owl forebrain, referred to as the archistriatal gaze fields (AGF), is shown to be involved in auditory orienting behavior. In a previous study, electrical microstimulation of the AGF was shown to produce saccadic movements of the eyes and head, and anatomical data revealed that neurons in the AGF region of the archistriatum project directly to brainstem tegmental nuclei that mediate gaze changes. In this study, we investigated the effects of AGF inactivation on the auditory orienting responses of trained barn owls. The AGF and/or the optic tectum (OT) were inactivated pharmacologically using the GABAA agonist muscimol. Inactivation of the AGF alone had no effect on the probability or accuracy of orienting responses to contralateral acoustic stimuli. Inactivation of the OT alone decreased the probability of responses to contralateral stimuli, but the animals were still capable of orienting accurately toward stimuli on about 60% of the trials. Inactivation of both the AGF and the OT drastically decreased the probability of responses to 16-21% and, on the few trials that the animals did respond, there was no relationship between the final direction of gaze and the location of the stimulus. Thus, with the AGF and OT both inactivated, the animals were no longer capable of orienting accurately toward acoustic stimuli located on the contralateral side. These data confirm that the AGF is involved in gaze control and that the AGF and the OT have parallel access to gaze control circuitry in the brainstem tegmentum. In these respects, the AGF in barn owls is functionally equivalent to the frontal eye fields in primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8721152     DOI: 10.1007/BF00242901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  S du Lac; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Between the retinotectal projection and directed movement: topography of a sensorimotor interface.

Authors:  P Grobstein
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: I. Subcortical pathways and topography of striatal and thalamic terminal fields.

Authors:  G B Stanton; M E Goldberg; C J Bruce
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-05-22       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: II. Topography of terminal fields in midbrain and pons.

Authors:  G B Stanton; M E Goldberg; C J Bruce
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-05-22       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Binaural tuning of auditory units in the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields of the barn owl: local organization but no space map.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Parallel pathways mediating both sound localization and gaze control in the forebrain and midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; P F Knudsen; T Masino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Subcortical contributions to head movements in macaques. I. Contrasting effects of electrical stimulation of a medial pontomedullary region and the superior colliculus.

Authors:  R J Cowie; D L Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Superior colliculus cell responses related to eye movements in awake monkeys.

Authors:  R H Wurtz; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J H Sandell; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Early visual experience shapes the representation of auditory space in the forebrain gaze fields of the barn owl.

Authors:  G L Miller; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; W Zheng; W M DeBello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; William M DeBello
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2010

7.  Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls.

Authors:  Greg L Miller; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stimulus-driven competition in a cholinergic midbrain nucleus.

Authors:  Ali Asadollahi; Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 24.884

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.