Literature DB >> 7623142

Binaural tuning of auditory units in the forebrain archistriatal gaze fields of the barn owl: local organization but no space map.

Y E Cohen1, E I Knudsen.   

Abstract

We identified a region in the archistriatum of the barn owl forebrain that contains neurons sensitive to auditory stimuli. Nearly all of these neurons are tuned for binaural localization cues. The archistriatum is known to be the primary source of motor-related output from the avian forebrain and, in barn owls, contributes to the control of gaze, much like the frontal eye fields in monkeys. The auditory region is located in the medial portion of the archistriatum, at the level of the anterior commissure, and is within the region of the archistriatum from which head saccades can be elicited by electrical microstimulation (see preceding companion article, Knudsen et al., 1995). Free-field measurements revealed that auditory sites have large, spatial receptive fields. However, within these large receptive fields, responses are tuned sharply for sound source location. Dichotic measurements showed that auditory sites are tuned broadly for frequency and that the majority are tuned to particular values of interaural time differences and interaural level differences, the principal cues used by barn owls for sound localization. The tuning of sites to these binaural cues is essentially independent of sound level. The auditory properties of units in the medial archistriatum are similar to those of units in the optic tectum, a structure that also contributes to gaze control. Unlike the optic tectum, however, the auditory region of the archistriatum does not contain a single, continuous auditory map of space. Instead, it is organized into dorsoventral clusters of sites with similar binaural (spatial) tuning. The different representations of auditory space in closely related structures in the forebrain (archistriatum) and midbrain (optic tectum) probably reflect the fact that the forebrain contributes to a wide variety of sensorimotor tasks more complicated than gaze control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623142      PMCID: PMC6577861     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  19 in total

1.  A site of auditory experience-dependent plasticity in the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Early visual experience shapes the representation of auditory space in the forebrain gaze fields of the barn owl.

Authors:  G L Miller; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Authors:  Dihui Lai; Sebastian Brandt; Harald Luksch; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Top-down control of multimodal sensitivity in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls.

Authors:  Greg L Miller; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.