Literature DB >> 8712866

Prediction of fractures in perimenopausal women: a comparison of dual energy x ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation.

A Stewart1, D J Torgerson, D M Reid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To consider whether bone mineral density (BMD) measurements can predict traumatic fractures occurring in perimenopausal women.
METHODS: One thousand perimenopausal women called up for screening underwent both dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine and hip, and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel. Two years later, they were sent a questionnaire to discover those who had since had a fracture, and compare them with those who had not.
RESULTS: About 2% of the women had sustained a fracture in the two years since attendance for screening. Fractures in this age group can be predicted weakly, but significantly, by bone mass measurements using DXA and BUA (odds ratios from 1.4 to 2.1). The lumbar spine appeared to be one of the best predictive sites (odds ratio for 1 SD reduction in BMD 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.8)), but no significant differences were found between the areas under the curve in receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.
CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study it appeared that bone mass measurements are predictive of perimenopausal traumatic fractures in addition to postmenopausal fractures related to osteoporosis. DXA of the lumbar spine did not perform significantly better than BUA. The number of fractures occurring was low, however, and further long term follow up is required to confirm the finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712866      PMCID: PMC1010110          DOI: 10.1136/ard.55.2.140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study.

Authors:  R W Porter; C G Miller; D Grainger; S B Palmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-29

2.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study.

Authors:  M J Garton; D J Torgerson; C Donaldson; I T Russell; D M Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

5.  Individuals who sustain nonosteoporotic fractures continue to also sustain fragility fractures.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; R Hasserius; K J Obrant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk.

Authors:  A Stewart; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Vertebral fractures in men and women: how discriminative are bone mass measurements?

Authors:  A Stewart; D Felsenberg; L Kalidis; D M Reid
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S H Ralston
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Impact of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD discordances on FRAX probabilities in women: a meta-analysis of international cohorts.

Authors:  H Johansson; J A Kanis; A Odén; W D Leslie; S Fujiwara; C C Glüer; H Kroger; A Z LaCroix; E Lau; L J Melton; J A Eisman; T W O'Neill; D Goltzman; D M Reid; E McCloskey
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Axial BMD, change in BMD and bone turnover do not predict breast cancer incidence in early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A Stewart; V Kumar; D J Torgerson; W D Fraser; F J Gilbert; D M Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Bone quality and bone mass as assessed by quantitative ultrasound and dual energy x ray absorptiometry in women with rheumatoid arthritis: relationship with quadriceps strength.

Authors:  O R Madsen; O H Sørensen; C Egsmose
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Quantitative ultrasound: use in the detection of fractures and in the assessment of bone composition.

Authors:  Claus-C Glüer; Reinhard Barkmann
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Bone status in rheumatoid arthritis assessed at peripheral sites by three different quantitative ultrasound devices.

Authors:  O R Madsen; C Suetta; C Egsmose; J S Lorentzen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women.

Authors:  J Huopio; H Kröger; R Honkanen; J Jurvelin; S Saarikoski; E Alhava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A protocol to prospectively assess risk factors for medial tibial stress syndrome in distance runners.

Authors:  Joshua Mattock; Julie R Steele; Karen J Mickle
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.