Literature DB >> 8711600

Resident education in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

R L Friedman1, B W Pace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resident education in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was studied in a retrospective analysis of consecutive cases performed at two academic institutions with different educational approaches.
METHODS: Each procedure was performed by a resident as operating surgeon under the direct guidance of one of a small, constant group of LC-certified attendings acting as first assistant. In group I (n = 48), residents acquired LC skills by graded exposure and surgical responsibility similar to their training in other general surgical procedures. In group II (n = 48) residents were additionally certified via an intensive course (including didactic and animal model experience) prior to assuming responsibility as surgeon.
RESULTS: Results were similar in each group. No technical errors were identified. Blood transfusion was not required related to surgery. Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 10% and 8% in groups I and II, respectively. The rate of complications was 4% for group I and 8% for group II. A longer operating time was noted in group I and may be attributed to nonoperative reasons.
CONCLUSIONS: Education in LC via graded experience throughout residency achieves results similar to that found with the addition of an intensive course. This additional training may not be necessary for surgical residents.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8711600     DOI: 10.1007/s004649910005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Initial experience with laparoscopic surgery: establishing a new surgical procedure.

Authors:  W V Sharp; D P Guyton; C A Crans; R A Abdu; J S Young; S S Dash; R M Kremer; A N Can
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-08

2.  Training, credentialing, and evaluation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T L Dent
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Incorporation of laparoscopy into a surgical endoscopy training program.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; A D Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Training, credentialling, and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  T L Dent
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program.

Authors:  R W Bailey; A L Imbembo; K A Zucker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Threat or opportunity?

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

7.  Endosurgical training methods: is it surgical training that is out of control?

Authors:  K A Forde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Reflections on surgical training.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium.

Authors:  J B Lichten; J J Reid; M P Zahalsky; R L Friedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Creating 3D models from Radiologic Images for Virtual Reality Medical Education Modules.

Authors:  Simon Ammanuel; Isaiah Brown; Jesus Uribe; Bhavya Rehani
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Javier R De La Garza; Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Laura Benner; Philip C Müller; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Accelerated learning curve for colorectal resection, open versus laparoscopic approach, can be attained with expert supervision.

Authors:  T Maeda; K Y Tan; Fumio Konishi; S Tsujinaka; K Mizokami; J Sasaki; Y J Kawamura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Evolution of surgical skills training.

Authors:  Kurt-E Roberts; Robert-L Bell; Andrew-J Duffy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Tetsuji Fujita; Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Implications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical residency training.

Authors:  D Böckler; J Geoghegan; M Klein; Q Weissmann; M Turan; L Meyer; J Scheele
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees.

Authors:  S G Koulas; J Tsimoyiannis; I Koutsourelakis; N Zikos; G Pappas-Gogos; P Siakas; E C Tsimoyiannis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  [Evaluation of residency training in general and digestive surgery in Tunisia].

Authors:  Ammar Mahmoudi; Faouzi Noomen; Mohamed Nasr; Khadija Zouari; Abdelaziz Hamdi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.