Literature DB >> 11443440

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium.

J B Lichten1, J J Reid, M P Zahalsky, R L Friedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Many authors-including investigators at our institution, who reported one of the initial experiences with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in July 1992-have documented a definite learning curve associated with this procedure. We present a follow-up study of our experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare these data to an earlier study of the initial experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Beth Israel Medical Center.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 consecutive patients from March 1998 through March 1999. The patient population was epidemiologically similar to that of the original study with regard to age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification. However, whereas the initial population included only patients with chronic disease, in our study 13.7% of the patients had been admitted through the emergency room with acute stone disease of the biliary tract.
RESULTS: We found a 5.7% conversion rate, a 1% rate of major complication, and a 5.7% rate of minor complication rates, as compared to the initial study's rates of 12%, 4%, and 10%, respectively. Whereas none of the patients in the original study left the hospital on the day of surgery and only 49% were discharged within 1 day, in our group, 29 patients (10%) underwent ambulatory procedures and an additional 186 patients (62%) were discharged on the 1st post-operative day. The average duration of the operation was 90 min, which did not represent a statistical improvement over the time of 93 min reported in the earlier study.
CONCLUSIONS: Since 1992, both the conversion rate and length of stay have declined at our hospital, but operative time has remained essentially the same. These findings probably reflect a bimodal learning curve, the increase in the number of cholangiograms and additional intraoperative procedures now performed, the greater severity of gallbladder disease currently treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and increases in the number of attending physicians as well as the level of residents who perform this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443440     DOI: 10.1007/s004640080004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study.

Authors:  A J Sabharwal; E J Minford; L P Marson; I M Muir; D Hill; C D Auld
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Acute cholecystitis with calculous biliary duct obstruction in the gravid patient. Management by ERCP, papillotomy, stone extraction, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R L Friedman; I H Friedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience.

Authors:  J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Cholecystectomy: the gold standard.

Authors:  C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcome.

Authors:  D I Giurgiu; D R Margulies; B J Carroll; J Gabbay; A Iida; S Takagi; M J Fallas; E H Phillips
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-08

Review 6.  The outcome of unretrieved gallstones in the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  M A Memon; R K Deeik; T R Maffi; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Changing indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stones without symptoms and symptoms without stones.

Authors:  W H Schwesinger; A K Diehl
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T R Gadacz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Kiviluoto; J Sirén; P Luukkonen; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J McMahon; G Fullarton; J N Baxter; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  New classification of the anatomic variations of cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  You-Ming Ding; Bin Wang; Wei-Xing Wang; Ping Wang; Ji-Shen Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Mini-cholecystectomy: a personal series in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Watanapa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Analysis of a structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Khoon Hean Tay; Swee Ho Lim; T Ravintharan; Ngian Chye Tan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Mini-cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective multicentric study among patients operated in some Eastern Libyan hospitals.

Authors:  Aimen Almahjoub; Osama Elfaedy; Salah Mansor; Ali Rabea; Abdugadir Abdulrahman; Almontaser Alhussaen
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Who did the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Craig A Blum; David B Adams
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Comparison of Postoperative Events between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xian-Xue Wang; Quan Zhou; Dao-Bo Pan; Hui-Wei Deng; Ai-Guo Zhou; Hua-Jing Guo; Fu-Rong Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.