Literature DB >> 30209607

Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial.

Javier R De La Garza1, Mona W Schmidt1, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski1, Laura Benner2, Philip C Müller1, Hannes G Kenngott1, Lars Fischer1, Beat P Müller-Stich1, Felix Nickel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental training of laparoscopic procedures with E-learning has been shown to translate to the operating room. The present study aims to explore whether the use of checklists during E-learning improves transfer of skills to the simulated OR on a Virtual Reality (VR) trainer for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
METHODS: Laparoscopy naive medical students (n = 80) were randomized in two groups. After an E-learning introduction to RYGB, checklist group rated RYGB videos using the validated Bariatric Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (BOSATS) checklist while group without checklist only observed the videos. Participants then performed RYGB on a VR-trainer twice and were evaluated by a blinded expert rater using BOSATS. A multiple choice (MC) knowledge test on RYGB was performed. Suturing on a cadaveric porcine small bowel was evaluated using objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS).
RESULTS: Checklist group was better in the knowledge test (A 8.3 ± 1.1 vs. B 7.1 ± 1.3; p ≤ 0.001) and there was a trend towards better VR RYGB performance (BOSATS) on the first try (85.9 ± 10.2 vs. 81.1 ± 11.5; p = 0.058), but not on the second try (92.0 ± 9.7 vs. 89.3 ± 10.5; p = 0.251). Suturing as measured by OSATS was not different (29.5 ± 3.0 vs. 29.0 ± 3.5; p = 0.472).
CONCLUSION: This study presents evidence that the use of a BOSATS checklist during E-learning helps trainees to improve their knowledge acquisition with E-learning. The transfer from mental training to the simulated OR environment seems to be partially enhanced by use of the BOSATS checklist. However, more research is required to investigate potential benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklist; Minimally invasive surgery; Multiple choice test; Obesity; Training; Virtual reality

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209607     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6441-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Transfer of training in the development of intracorporeal suturing skill in medical student novices: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claude Muresan; Tommy H Lee; Jacob Seagull; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Laparoscopic Suturing and Intracorporeal Knot Tying.

Authors:  Olivia H Chang; Louise P King; Anna M Modest; Hye-Chun Hur
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Mastery in Bariatric Surgery: The Long-term Surgeon Learning Curve of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Sama Anvari; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Objective structured assessment of technical skills in elliptical excision repair of senior dermatology residents: a multirater, blinded study of operating room video recordings.

Authors:  Murad Alam; Michael Nodzenski; Simon Yoo; Emily Poon; Diana Bolotin
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Christian Stock; Mohamed Salama; Anas A Preukschas; Jonas D Senft; Karl F Kowalewski; Martin Wagner; Hannes G Kenngott; Georg R Linke; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 7.  Training programs influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raquel Sánchez-Santos; Sergio Estévez; Catherine Tomé; Sonia González; Antonia Brox; Raul Nicolás; Rosario Crego; Miguel Piñón; Carles Masdevall; Antonio Torres
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Current status of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Yosuke Seki; Kazunori Kasama
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2010-10

9.  Multimedia-based training on Internet platforms improves surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carolina Pape-Koehler; Marc Immenroth; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Cornelia Lindlohr; Jens Toaspern; Markus Heiss
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Myura Nagendran; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rajesh Aggarwal; Marilena Loizidou; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-27
View more
  9 in total

1.  Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

Authors:  F S Wehrtmann; J R de la Garza; K F Kowalewski; M W Schmidt; K Müller; C Tapking; P Probst; M K Diener; L Fischer; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Is checklist an effective tool for teaching research students? A survey-based study.

Authors:  Julia Wang; Gladson Vaghela; Abdelrahman M Makram; Dhir Gala; Nguyen Khoi Quan; Nguyen Tran Minh Duc; Atsuko Imoto; Kazuhiko Moji; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 3.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

4.  Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Caelan M Haney; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Vasile V Bintintan; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Alberto Arezzo; Marcus Bahra; Marc G Besselink; Matthias Biebl; Luigi Boni; Michele Diana; Jan H Egberts; Lars Fischer; Nader Francis; Daniel A Hashimoto; Daniel Perez; Marlies Schijven; Moritz Schmelzle; Marek Soltes; Lee Swanstrom; Thilo Welsch; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 13.828

6.  Comparing learning outcomes among postgraduate year trainee groups.

Authors:  Peng-Wei Hsu; Ren-Huei Fu; Yu-Che Chang
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Development of a median sternotomy simulation model for cardiac surgery training.

Authors:  Thin Xuan Vo; Nadzir Juanda; Janet Ngu; Nada Gawad; Kathy LaBelle; Fraser D Rubens
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-04-05

8.  The impact of multi-person virtual reality competitive learning on anatomy education: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Du; Shih-Chen Fan; Li-Cheng Yang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.