Literature DB >> 8710450

Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments.

H N Schifferstein1, I M Oudejans.   

Abstract

When all stimuli elicit the same taste quality, solutions preceded by a high concentration level are judged to be significantly less intense than solutions preceded by a low concentration level. After repetitious stimulation with a different tasting stimulus, the intensity of the present stimulus is over-estimated. This phenomenon is called "successive contrast." In the present study, the cumulative effects of three identical stimuli on the saltiness ratings for a test stimulus are investigated. The preceding stimuli are manipulated with regard to taste quality, saltiness intensity, total taste intensity, and complexity. Whether the size of the cumulative contrast effect is associated with the degree of dissimilarity between preceding stimuli and test stimulus, or with the saltiness or total taste intensity of the preceding stimuli, is investigated. The size of the contrast effect depends on the type of preceding stimulus, its intensity, and the type of test stimulus. No association was found with judgments of the degree of dissimilarity between the preceding stimuli and the test stimulus. For nonsalty preceding stimuli, the contrast effects are independent of concentration level. When the preceding stimuli taste at least partly salty, the total intensity appears to determine the size of the contrast for an unmixed salty test stimulus.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8710450     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  29 in total

1.  Interactions of suprathreshold taste stimuli.

Authors:  J M KAMEN; F J PILGRIM; N J GUTMAN; B J KROLL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-10

2.  Optional processes in similarity judgments.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks; K E Lesko
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

3.  The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

4.  Sweetness does not habituate during a sip-and-spit experiment.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; J E Frijters
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-02

5.  The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

Authors:  A Parducci; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation.

Authors:  L Festinger; S Coren; G Rivers
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1970-06

7.  Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste-odor and taste-taste interactions.

Authors:  R A Frank; N J van der Klaauw; H N Schifferstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

8.  Sequential effects in judgments of loudness.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling:sequential dependencies and other properties.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-01

10.  A quantitative analysis of sequential effects with numeric stimuli.

Authors:  M Wagner; J C Baird
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Flavor-intensity perception: effects of stimulus context.

Authors:  Lawrence E Marks; Timothy G Shepard; Kelly Burger; Emily M Chakwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-10

2.  Flavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context.

Authors:  Emily S Hallowell; Roshan Parikh; Maria G Veldhuizen; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Adam Y Shavit; Maria G Veldhuizen; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 1.490

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.