Literature DB >> 1549437

The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua.

L E Marks1.   

Abstract

When subjects gave magnitude estimates of 500- and 2500-Hz tones at various SPLs, they judged a 500-Hz tone of 60 dB to be as loud as a 2500-Hz tone of 57 dB in one context (low SPLs at 500 Hz, high SPLs at 2500 Hz), but as loud as a 2500-Hz tone at 40 dB in another context (high SPLs at 500 Hz, low at 2500 Hz) (Marks, 1988). Such shifts in matches derived from judgments of multidimensionally varying stimuli are termed slippery context effects. The present set of seven experiments showed that slippery effects were absent from judgments of pitch of tones at different loudnesses, duration of tones at different pitches, and length of lines at different colors, though a small effect emerged in judgments of duration of tones and lights. Slippery context effects were substantial when subjects gave magnitude estimates of loudness of 500- and 2500-Hz tones under conditions in which the pitch at each trial either was cued visually beforehand or could be known through the regular stimulus sequence, and with instructions to make absolute magnitude estimates. The results are consistent with the view that slippery context effects occur automatically and "preattentively."

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549437     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  24 in total

1.  JUDGMENT OF FILLED AND UNFILLED DURATIONS: INTERSENSORY FACTORS.

Authors:  S GOLDSTONE; J L GOLDFARB
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1963-12

2.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

3.  Reliability of magnitude matching.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

4.  Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

5.  Range and sequence effects in judgment.

Authors:  G R Lockhead; J Hinson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

6.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

7.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method.

Authors:  G Z Greenberg; W D Larkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sequential effects in judgments of loudness.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-05

10.  Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling:sequential dependencies and other properties.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian?

Authors:  Kevin M Sailor; Miriam Antoine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

2.  Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; I M Oudejans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

3.  Contextual influences on interactive processing: effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty.

Authors:  R D Melara; J R Mounts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

4.  Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference.

Authors:  E Ben-Artzi; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.