Literature DB >> 2946806

The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation.

A Parducci, D H Wedell.   

Abstract

Squares receive higher category ratings when the smaller sizes are presented more frequently than the larger sizes. This shift in the rating scale is greater when there are either fewer categories (the Category Effect) or more stimuli. Similar shifts were obtained whether the stimuli were presented successively for judgment or simultaneously. The Category Effect also occurred when subjects were not told how many categories to use until after the contextual stimuli had been presented. A simple range-frequency model describes most of the shifts in scale by variations in a single weighting parameter. However, these shifts are predicted by an elaborated model in which the number of representations of any stimulus in working memory is limited by a principle of consistent assignment of each stimulus to a single category. This elaborated model correctly predicts the disappearance of the Category Effect when contexts are manipulated by varying the spacing of stimulus values rather than by varying their relative frequencies.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2946806     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.4.496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; J E Frijters
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

2.  Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.

Authors:  Debra A Zellner; Dawn Allen; Monique Henley; Scott Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

3.  Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales.

Authors:  Paul F M Krabbe; Peep F M Stalmeier; Leida M Lamers; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.

Authors:  Kirsten Sucker; Ralf Both; Michael Bischoff; Rainer Guski; Gerhard Winneke
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  An "open-transformed scale" for correcting ceiling effects and enhancing retest reliability: the example of pain.

Authors:  E Fernandez; T E Nygren; B E Thorn
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-06

6.  Derivation and evaluation of a labeled hedonic scale.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Alison Wood; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments.

Authors:  H N Schifferstein; I M Oudejans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

9.  Range and distribution effects on number line placement.

Authors:  Simon Kemp; Matt Grice; Dena Makarious; Kate Stuart; Georgina C Carvell; Nicola J Morton; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: a comparison of psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.