Literature DB >> 8707081

Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

C W Wu1, M C Hsieh, S S Lo, S H Tsay, W Y Lui, F K P'eng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No nodal grouping category of gastric cancer has been universally accepted for the grading of the effectiveness of therapeutic regimens. AIMS: To establish an appropriate nodal grouping as a forecaster of distant disease and test its validity as a determinant in survival. PATIENTS: Five hundred and ten patients who underwent curative resections for gastric cancer were studied.
METHODS: Retrospectively analyse the prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes.
RESULTS: A total of 17 176 lymph nodes with an average of 34 per specimen were removed, of which 2811 (16%) showed metastases. Among the 510 patients, 287 (56%) had lymph node metastases, with an average of 9.8 per metastatic case. The survival of all patients was related to their nodal status, an abrupt decrease in survival was seen between 0 and 1 and 4 compared with 5 or more modes while little difference in survival existed among 1, 2, 3, and 4, and among 5, 6, 7, and 8 positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of positive nodes (1-4, 5-8 versus > or = 9; relative risk 2.2) and depth of cancer invasion (three levels; relative risk 1.9) were independently correlated with survival. The current nodal stage was not a prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastric cancer patients with 0, 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and > 9 positive nodes may represent four appropriate prognostic groups and should be adopted for classification of nodal stage in gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8707081      PMCID: PMC1383108          DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.4.525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  13 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Makino; S Moriwaki; M Yonekawa; M Oota; O Kimura; N Kaibara
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  T Okusa; Y Nakane; T Boku; H Takada; M Yamamura; K Hioki; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-06

4.  Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer.

Authors:  J T Brodsky; G K Richard; A M Cohen; B D Minsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Norwegian multicentre study of survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric carcinoma. The Norwegian Stomach Cancer Trial.

Authors:  T K Haugstvedt; A Viste; G E Eide; O Söreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Lymph node metastasis from carcinoma of the distal one-third of the stomach.

Authors:  C W Wu; M J Hsieh; S S Lo; S H Tsay; W Y Lui; F K P'eng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage based on their location in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Ichikura; S Tomimatsu; Y Okusa; K Uefuji; S Tamakuma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a multivariate analysis of clinical, pathologic and treatment factors.

Authors:  M H Shiu; M Perrotti; M F Brennan
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1989-02

9.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group.

Authors:  H Rohde; B Gebbensleben; P Bauer; H Stützer; J Zieschang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  25 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Bi-Juan Lin; Jia-Bin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Prognostic indicators for survival after curative resection for patients with carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  C W Wu; M C Hsieh; S S Lo; S H Tsay; A F Li; W Y Lui; F K P'eng
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer from cardia and fundus.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Bi-Juan Lin; Hui-Shan Lu; Xiang-Fu Zhang; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Solitary lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chen Li; Sungsoo Kim; Ji Fu Lai; Sung Jin Oh; Woo Jin Hyung; Won Hyuk Choi; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Investigation of the recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Han Liang; Dianchang Wang; Dan Sun; Yi Pan; Yong Liu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Fluorescent Lymphography-Guided Lymphadenectomy During Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  In Gyu Kwon; Taeil Son; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Clinicopathology and Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux After Radical Surgery of Proximal Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Ming Ying; Zheng Chen; Cheng-Xue Dang; Min-Chang Sun; Gui-Ru Yan; Bing-Hua Kan; Zi-Seng Xu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  N stages of the seventh edition of TNM Classification are the most intensive variables for predictions of the overall survival of gastric cancer patients who underwent limited lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Rupeng Zhang; Yuan Pan; Baogui Wang; Liangliang Wu; Xishan Hao; Han Liang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-29

10.  Prognostic impact of dissected lymph node count on patients with node-negative gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Bi-Juan Lin; Hui-Shan Lu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.