Literature DB >> 2684385

Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group.

H Rohde1, B Gebbensleben, P Bauer, H Stützer, J Zieschang.   

Abstract

This multicenter observational study examined the survival of 1420 patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the stomach. From April 1982 through October 1984, 1360 (95%) patients underwent surgery, 988 (72%) had resections, and 372 (28%) minor surgical procedures. The percentage of patients who have been followed until death or 3 to 5 years was 99.4%. Patients were staged preoperatively and intraoperatively and by pathologists using the old (1978) and new (1987) TNM stage groupings and 5-year survival was analyzed. Subgroups of patients who changed their stage group according to the new stage definitions were analyzed separately. Only age was an important prognostic factor for survival in Stage IA (P less than 0.05) and Stage IB (P less than 0.01). Residual tumor after surgery was most important for survival in Stage II (P less than 0.01) and Stage IIIA (P less than 0.001). This indicates that improvements of stage definitions for individual prognosis can only be achieved by adding data concerning the presence or absence of residual tumor (R classification).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2684385     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2465::aid-cncr2820641212>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Indications for staging laparoscopy in clinical T4M0 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhito Tsuchida; Takaki Yoshikawa; Akira Tsuburaya; Haruhiko Cho; Osamu Kobayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  [Early stomach cancer in comparison with advanced stomach cancer. Results of a prospective study of diagnosis and 5-year survival of 131 patients with early stomach cancer and 795 patients with advanced stomach cancer].

Authors:  H Rohde; H Stützer; P Bauer; K Heitmann; B Gebbensleben
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

4.  Morphological predictors of survival in early and advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  P Schmitz-Moormann; P Hermanek; G W Himmelmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Does endoscopic ultrasound staging already allow individual treatment regimens in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Stojan Potrc; Marjan Skalicky; Arpad Ivanecz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: when, for whom and why.

Authors:  D H Roukos
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C W Wu; M C Hsieh; S S Lo; S H Tsay; W Y Lui; F K P'eng
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Perspectives of surgery and multimodality treatment in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  H J Meyer; J Jähne; H Wilke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Comparison of colorectal and gastric cancer: survival and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Mohammad R Zali
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Polymorphisms of TGFB1 and VEGF genes and survival of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Guan; Hui Zhao; Jiangong Niu; Dongfeng Tan; Jaffer A Ajani; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.