Literature DB >> 8691500

Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women: impact of a simple centralized HMO intervention.

R E Hardy1, C Eckert, M K Hargreaves, Y Belay, T N Jones, A J Cebrun.   

Abstract

In 1994, it was estimated that about 44,500 American women would die from breast cancer and 7000 women from cervical cancer. While early detection methods (screening mammography, breast examinations, and pap smears) have proven to be effective means of decreasing these cancers, they are underused by all groups. In particular, low-income women use them least, resulting in their lower survival and higher mortality rates than the rest of the population. This article quantifies the effect of a simple intervention undertaken by a health maintenance organization (HMO) serving the indigent to improve breast and cervical cancer screening rates. The HMO mailed personal letters and newsletter articles to women members > or = 40 years about the need for cancer prevention. Articles also were printed in the monthly HMO newsletters to providers about the benefits of using these early detection methods. A review of provider claims from 574 women showed that baseline utilization rates for screening mammograms and pap smears before the intervention in year 1 (1990) were 14% and 16.4%, respectively. After the intervention, in years 2 and 3, mammograms had increased to 41% and pap smears to 38% for both years, indicating a levelling off effect of the intervention by year 3. These data show that while a significant improvement in screening behaviors was achieved, the intervention impact was limited to only about one third of the sample on the long term. Further, data do not indicate whether behavioral change was initiated as the member or provider level. More research is needed to increase overall screening behavior among the indigent and their physicians. The results reported here provide a baseline against which more intensive interventions can be measured in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8691500      PMCID: PMC2608093     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  8 in total

1.  The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography.

Authors:  J A Stein; S A Fox; P J Murata
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1991-06

2.  Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; G L Jackson; R O Lundy; G N Peters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Involving the Southern rural church and students of the health professions in health education.

Authors:  J W Hatch; K A Lovelace
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Andrews; J Kerner; A Zauber; W Burnett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites.

Authors:  C R Baquet; J W Horm; T Gibbs; P Greenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-04-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Racial differences in survival of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  R P Bain; R S Greenberg; J P Whitaker
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The ACA: implications for the accessibility and quality of breast and cervical cancer prevention and treatment services.

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Revisiting the effect of the Pap test on cervical cancer.

Authors:  N D Holmquist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Receipt of preventive services among privately insured minorities in managed care versus fee-for-service insurance plans.

Authors:  David E DeLaet; Steven Shea; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.