Literature DB >> 12133160

Receipt of preventive services among privately insured minorities in managed care versus fee-for-service insurance plans.

David E DeLaet1, Steven Shea, Olveen Carrasquillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compare preventive services utilization among privately insured African Americans and Hispanics in managed care organizations (MCOs) versus fee-for-service (FFS) plans. We also examine racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of preventive services among enrollees in FFS or MCO plans.
DESIGN: Analysis of the nationally representative 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 1,120 Hispanic, 929 African-American, and 6,383 non-Hispanic white (NHW) adults age 18 to 64 years with private health insurance.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We examined self-reported receipt of physical examination, blood pressure measurement, cholesterol assessment, Papanicolau testing, screening mammography, and breast and prostate examinations. Multivariate modeling was used to adjust for age, gender, education, household income, and health status. Hispanics in MCOs were more likely than their FFS counterparts to report having preventive services, with adjusted differences ranging from 5 to 19 percentage points (P <.05 for physical examination, blood pressure measurement, breast examination and Pap smear). Among African Americans, such patterns were of a smaller magnitude. In both MCOs and FFS plans the proportion of African Americans reporting preventive services was equal to or greater than NHWs. In contrast, among Hispanic women in FFS, a non-statistically significant trend of fewer cancer screening tests than NHW's was observed (Pap smears 75% vs 80%; mammograms 66% vs 74%, respectively). In both MCO and FFS plans, Hispanics were less likely than NHWs to report having blood pressure and cholesterol measurement (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: With the demise of traditional MCOs, reform efforts should incorporate those aspects of MCOs that were associated with greater preventive service utilization, particularly among Hispanics. Existing ethnic disparities warrant further attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12133160      PMCID: PMC1495058          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10512.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  34 in total

1.  Health plan switching: choice or circumstance?

Authors:  P J Cunningham; L Kohn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Gatekeeping reconsidered.

Authors:  D Lawrence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Racial disparity in influenza vaccination: does managed care narrow the gap between African Americans and whites?

Authors:  E C Schneider; P D Cleary; A M Zaslavsky; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The end of managed care.

Authors:  J C Robinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Disparities in health and health care: moving from describing the problem to a call for action.

Authors:  C M Mangione; E Reynolds
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  HMO enrollment by Medicare beneficiaries in heterogeneous communities.

Authors:  K Siddharthan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Quality of care in investor-owned vs not-for-profit HMOs.

Authors:  D U Himmelstein; S Woolhandler; I Hellander; S M Wolfe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Race, ethnicity and preventive services: no gains for Hispanics.

Authors:  J L Hargraves
Journal:  Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change       Date:  2001-01

Review 10.  Approaches to eliminating sociocultural disparities in health.

Authors:  C R Horowitz; M H Davis; A G Palermo; B C Vladeck
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2000
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Race differences in access to health care and disparities in incident chronic kidney disease in the US.

Authors:  Kira Evans; Josef Coresh; Lori D Bash; Tiffany Gary-Webb; Anna Köttgen; Kathryn Carson; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Reducing disparities downstream: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Nativity and cardiovascular disease screening practices.

Authors:  Janine M Jurkowski
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2006-10

5.  Promoting use of colorectal cancer screening tests. Can we change physician behavior?

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; René Salazar; Jonathan P Terdiman; Ginny Gildengorin; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Are health-care relationships important for mammography adherence in Latinas?

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Judy Wang; Bin Yi; Toni Michelle Harrison; Shibao Feng; Elmer E Huerta; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Jose J Arbelaez; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Impact of health literacy on socioeconomic and racial differences in health in an elderly population.

Authors:  David H Howard; Tetine Sentell; Julie A Gazmararian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.473

9.  Effects of sex, age, and visits on receipt of preventive healthcare services: a secondary analysis of national data.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joshua M Thorpe; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among underserved minority women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erin Kobetz; Julia Seay; Anthony Amofah; Larry Pierre; Jordan Baeker Bispo; Dinah Trevil; Martha Gonzalez; Martine Poitevien; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.