Literature DB >> 8691160

Sign tracking versus goal tracking in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).

M Burns1, M Domjan.   

Abstract

Pairings of a conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimulus can result in approach to either the CS (sign tracking) or the US (goal tracking). Increasing the spatial or temporal separation between the CS and a US food has been reported to results in a decline in sign tracking and an increase in goal tracking. In the present experiments, sign tracking was the predominant response of male quail (Coturnix japonica) to a CS that was presented up to 91 cm from the door through which a female was presented as the US (Experiment 1). Contrary to reported results with food reinforcement, goal tracking was not facilitated by increasing the spatial separation between the CS and US (Experiment 2) or by introducing a trace interval between them (Experiment 3). The preponderance of sign tracking may reflect an adaptive specialization of sexual conditioning or may be related to the absence of magazine training and the use of a moving US in the sexual conditioning procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8691160     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.22.3.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  12 in total

1.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  The nucleus accumbens and Pavlovian reward learning.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Repeated subcutaneous administration of PT150 has dose-dependent effects on sign tracking in male Japanese quail.

Authors:  Beth Ann Rice; Meredith A Saunders; Julia E Jagielo-Miller; Mark A Prendergast; Chana K Akins
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.