Literature DB >> 30896239

Repeated subcutaneous administration of PT150 has dose-dependent effects on sign tracking in male Japanese quail.

Beth Ann Rice1, Meredith A Saunders2, Julia E Jagielo-Miller2, Mark A Prendergast2, Chana K Akins2.   

Abstract

A devastating feature of drug dependence is the susceptibility of relapse (40-60%) after stretches of abstinence. In both animal and human research, it has been demonstrated that cues (e.g., levers, paraphernalia) associated with drug reward can instigate renewed drug taking. Research has shown animals that attend to a cue that predicts reward more than the location of reward delivery when the cue is present (sign trackers) have an increase in corticosterone (CORT), a primary stress hormone when compared with animals that do not sign track. This interaction of sign tracking and CORT implicate CORT's effects as a possible pharmacological target for cue-induced relapse behaviors. PT150 is a novel glucocorticoid receptor antagonist that reduces the effects of CORT. Previous research has shown that oral administration of 40 mg/kg PT150 reduced sign tracking. To better understand dose-dependent effects and to control for more accurate doses, the current experiment hypothesized that PT150 (20/40/60 mg/kg) given by subcutaneous (SC) injection to male quail would reduce sign tracking to a keylight conditional stimulus that predicts a grain unconditioned stimulus dose dependently. Results showed that SC injection of 20 mg/kg PT150 reduced sign tracking, but 40 or 60 mg/kg did not. The main findings from the current study are that the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist PT150 reduces sign tracking behavior dose dependently, and SC administration may provide better bioavailability compared with our previous study that used an oral route of administration. The current findings support previous literature by suggesting that the glucocorticoid receptor may be a potential pharmacological target for reducing relapse-like behaviors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896239      PMCID: PMC6776696          DOI: 10.1037/pha0000275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  28 in total

1.  Topography of spatially directed conditioned responding: effects of context and trial duration.

Authors:  M Burns; M Domjan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-07

2.  Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior.

Authors:  W M Davis; S G Smith
Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci       Date:  1976 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Cholinergic control over attention in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Giovanna Paolone; Christopher C Angelakos; Paul J Meyer; Terry E Robinson; Martin Sarter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The mechanism of RU486 antagonism is dependent on the conformation of the carboxy-terminal tail of the human progesterone receptor.

Authors:  E Vegeto; G F Allan; W T Schrader; M J Tsai; D P McDonnell; B W O'Malley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Glucocorticoid receptor antagonists: new tools to investigate disorders characterized by cortisol hypersecretion.

Authors:  B W M M Peeters; J A D M Tonnaer; M B Groen; C L E Broekkamp; H A A van der Voort; W G F J Schoonen; R J M Smets; P M L Vanderheyden; R Gebhard; G S F Ruigt
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.493

7.  Operant conditioning in the newly hatched quail : Fixed interval performance.

Authors:  H Lejeune; J Nagy
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effect of chronic administration of selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonists on the rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis.

Authors:  Cornelius G Bachmann; Astrid C E Linthorst; Florian Holsboer; Johannes M H M Reul
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Differential effects of the new glucocorticoid receptor antagonist ORG 34517 and RU486 (mifepristone) on glucocorticoid receptor nuclear translocation in the AtT20 cell line.

Authors:  B W M M Peeters; G S F Ruigt; M Craighead; P Kitchener
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  A proposed role for glucocorticoids in mediating dopamine-dependent cue-reward learning.

Authors:  Sofia A Lopez; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.493

2.  Male Goal-Tracker and Sign-Tracker Rats Do Not Differ in Neuroendocrine or Behavioral Measures of Stress Reactivity.

Authors:  Sofia A Lopez; Eman Mubarak; Charlotte Yang; Aram Parsegian; Marin Klumpner; Paolo Campus; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Clinical stage molecule PT150 is a modulator of glucocorticoid and androgen receptors with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Neil D Theise; Anthony R Arment; Dimple Chakravarty; John M H Gregg; Ira M Jacobson; Kie Hoon Jung; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari; Archie W Thurston; John Van Drie; Jonna B Westover
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  A Novel Glucocorticoid and Androgen Receptor Modulator Reduces Viral Entry and Innate Immune Inflammatory Responses in the Syrian Hamster Model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Savannah M Rocha; Anna C Fagre; Amanda S Latham; Jason E Cummings; Tawfik A Aboellail; Philip Reigan; Devin A Aldaz; Casey P McDermott; Katriana A Popichak; Rebekah C Kading; Tony Schountz; Neil D Theise; Richard A Slayden; Ronald B Tjalkens
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.