Literature DB >> 2997232

Lower-extremity sensibility testing in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

M D Weise, S R Garfin, R H Gelberman, M M Katz, R P Thorne.   

Abstract

The significance of sensory changes determined by pinprick and light touch in individuals with a herniated lumbar disc has been questioned. Discrepancies may be related to the subjectiveness of the test, failure to use dermatome-specific testing sites, overlap of areas that are innervated by different nerve roots, anatomical variations, or lack of sensitivity of the testing technique. For this study, we assessed the results of sensory examinations of twenty-five patients with documented herniation of a lumbar disc. The examinations were done using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, vibrometry, pinprick, and light touch in the autonomous skin areas supplied by the fourth and fifth lumbar and first sacral-nerve roots. Right-left differences in Semmes-Weinstein pressure thresholds of more than fifteen milligrams per square millimeter enabled us to localize disc lesions to a specific root in 100 per cent of patients and differences in vibratory thresholds of more than 3.5 micrometers, to localize the correct level in 88 per cent. Lesser differences in thresholds did not help to identify the involved root. The mean sensory threshold on the side of the disc lesion was found to be significantly greater than that on the opposite side by both vibrometry and pressure aesthesiometry (p less than 0.005). These findings were not duplicated using light touch or pinprick testing. Even with the most sophisticated sensibility-testing techniques, correct identification of the nerve root that was compressed by a herniated lumbar disc was accurate in only 50 per cent of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2997232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  A critical assessment of clinical diagnosis of disc herniation in patients with monoradicular sciatica.

Authors:  M J Albeck
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Disturbances of C-fibre-mediated sensibility in lumbosacral disc disease.

Authors:  F Strian; S Lautenbacher; G Karlbauer; G Galfe
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Clinical correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with symptom complex in prolapsed intervertebral disc disease: A cross-sectional double blind analysis.

Authors:  Jeetendra Bajpai; Sumit Saini; Rakhi Singh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2013-01

Review 4.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Pinprick and Light Touch Are Adequate to Establish Sensory Dysfunction in Patients with Lumbar Radicular Pain and Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Eivind Hasvik; Anne Julsrud Haugen; Lars Grøvle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Correlation of clinical presentation with intraoperative level diagnosis in lower lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hamed Reihani-Kermani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.