Literature DB >> 8681978

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens by a commercial polymerase chain reaction kit.

F Stauffer1, R Mutschlechner, P Hasenberger, S Stadlbauer, H Schinko.   

Abstract

A total of 722 respiratory and 86 nonrespiratory specimens obtained from 456 patients were tested for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by a commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit (Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems) and the results compared with those of microscopy and culture (solid and radiometric media). Respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens were analysed separately. Of the respiratory specimens, 54 were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex both in the PCR and in culture, five were positive in the PCR but negative in culture, and eight were positive in culture but negative in the PCR. Four cultures were positive for mycobacteria other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis; none of these gave a positive result in the commercial test. Resolution of discrepant results was performed by analysis of patients' clinical data. For respiratory specimens the sensitivity of the commercial test was 87.6%, the specificity 99.6%, the positive predictive value 96.6%, and the negative predictive value 98.7%. For nonrespiratory specimens the sensitivity was 60%, whereas the specificity ranged as high as 98.6%. For this group the positive predictive value was 85.7% and the negative predictive value 94.9%. When respiratory specimens are used, the commercial PCR test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, with its high sensitivity and specificity, is a good complementary diagnostic tool for rapid diagnosis of bronchopulmonary tuberculosis in a routine mycobacterial laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8681978     DOI: 10.1007/bf01590937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  12 in total

1.  The Bactec-system in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Comparison of a conventional and the radiometric method (Bactec) for culturing, differentiation and susceptibility testing of mycobacteria.

Authors:  J Presslich; E Lahounik; G Kraus
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A       Date:  1989-03

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories.

Authors:  G T Noordhoek; A H Kolk; G Bjune; D Catty; J W Dale; P E Fine; P Godfrey-Faussett; S N Cho; T Shinnick; S B Svenson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Automatable radiometric detection of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in selective media.

Authors:  G Middlebrook; Z Reggiardo; W D Tigertt
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1977-06

4.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.

Authors:  C Abe; K Hirano; M Wada; Y Kazumi; M Takahashi; Y Fukasawa; T Yoshimura; C Miyagi; S Goto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K D Eisenach; M D Sifford; M D Cave; J H Bates; J T Crawford
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-11

6.  Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  N Miller; S G Hernandez; T J Cleary
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system.

Authors:  G E Pfyffer; P Kissling; R Wirth; R Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens.

Authors:  M A Morgan; C D Horstmeier; D R DeYoung; G D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid detection of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  M Tötsch; K W Schmid; E Brömmelkamp; A Stücker; C Puelacher; G Sidoroff; G Mikuz; W Böcker; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Screening of respiratory tract specimens for the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test.

Authors:  T Bodmer; A Gurtner; K Schopfer; L Matter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  10 in total

1.  Removal of PCR inhibitors by silica membranes: evaluating the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis kit.

Authors:  B Böddinghaus; T A Wichelhaus; V Brade; T Bittner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prospective clinical evaluation of the serologic tuberculous glycolipid test in combination with the nucleic acid amplification test.

Authors:  Ryoji Maekura; Hiroaki Kohno; Atsushi Hirotani; Yoshinari Okuda; Masami Ito; Takeshi Ogura; Ikuya Yano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical evaluation of the automated COBAS AMPLICOR MTB assay for testing respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.

Authors:  U Reischl; N Lehn; H Wolf; L Naumann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare in the blood of HIV-infected patients by a commercial polymerase chain reaction kit.

Authors:  B Ninet; R Auckenthaler; P Rohner; O Delaspre; B Hirschel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Performance of an automated Q-beta replicase amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinical trial.

Authors:  J H Smith; G Radcliffe; S Rigby; D Mahan; D J Lane; J D Klinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test.

Authors:  S Ehlers; R Ignatius; T Regnath; H Hahn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Genus level identification of mycobacteria from clinical specimens by using an easy-to-handle Mycobacterium-specific PCR assay.

Authors:  F Stauffer; H Haber; A Rieger; R Mutschlechner; P Hasenberger; V J Tevere; K K Young
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay with in-house PCR and culture for detection of M. tuberculosis.

Authors:  B R Eing; A Becker; A Sohns; R Ringelmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Commercial nucleic-acid amplification tests for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in respiratory specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Daphne I Ling; Laura L Flores; Lee W Riley; Madhukar Pai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of in-house PCR with conventional techniques and Cobas Amplicor M. tuberculosis kit for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Myeong-Hee Kim; Hee-Young Yang; Jin-Tae Suh; Hee Joo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.