Literature DB >> 8150935

Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories.

G T Noordhoek1, A H Kolk, G Bjune, D Catty, J W Dale, P E Fine, P Godfrey-Faussett, S N Cho, T Shinnick, S B Svenson.   

Abstract

PCR is, in principle, a simple and rapid test for use in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, virtually no data are available on the reliability and reproducibility of the method. In order to assess the validity of PCR for the detection of mycobacteria in clinical samples, seven laboratories participated in a blinded study of 200 sputum, saliva, and water samples containing either known numbers of Mycobacterium bovis BCG cells or no added organisms. Each laboratory used its own protocol for pretreatment, DNA extraction, and detection of the amplification product. Insertion sequence IS6110 was the target for DNA amplification. Several participating laboratories reported high levels of false-positive PCR results, with rates ranging from 3 to 20% and with one extreme value of 77%. The levels of sensitivity also ranged widely among the different participants. A positive PCR result was reported for 2 to 90% of the samples with 10(3) mycobacteria. Although most participants did include control tests to check the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR, the sequence of operations from sample pretreatment to purification of DNA from bacteria was not always monitored adequately. During these procedures cross-contaminating DNA was introduced and/or bacterial DNA was lost. The results of the study show that the implementation of an effective system for monitoring sensitivity and specificity is required before the PCR can be used reliably in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150935      PMCID: PMC263025          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.277-284.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  48 in total

1.  Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Authors:  K Kaneko; O Onodera; T Miyatake; S Tsuji
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reactions.

Authors:  M C Longo; M S Berninger; J L Hartley
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples.

Authors:  Y Miyazaki; H Koga; S Kohno; M Kaku
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA.

Authors:  B Böddinghaus; T Rogall; T Flohr; H Blöcker; E C Böttger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Simplified colorimetric analysis of polymerase chain reactions: detection of HIV sequences in AIDS patients.

Authors:  D J Kemp; M J Churchill; D B Smith; B A Biggs; S J Foote; M G Peterson; N Samaras; N J Deacon; R Doherty
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  U Sjöbring; M Mecklenburg; A B Andersen; H Miörner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification.

Authors:  D De Wit; L Steyn; S Shoemaker; M Sogin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA amplification.

Authors:  C C Pao; T S Yen; J B You; J S Maa; E H Fiss; C H Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Genus- and species-specific DNA probes to identify mycobacteria using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  J W Fries; R J Patel; W F Piessens; D F Wirth
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis.

Authors:  P W Hermans; D van Soolingen; J W Dale; A R Schuitema; R A McAdam; D Catty; J D van Embden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  122 in total

Review 1.  Tuberculosis: 7. Laboratory aspects of diagnosis.

Authors:  A Laszlo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Single-tube balanced heminested PCR for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in smear-negative samples.

Authors:  A García-Quintanilla; L Garcia; G Tudó; M Navarro; J González; M T Jiménez de Anta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Assessment of laboratory performance of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  John C Ridderhof; Laurina O Williams; Sue Legois; Peter A Shult; Beverly Metchock; Louise N Kubista; James H Handsfield; Ronald J Fehd; Pamela H Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Absence of the genetic marker IS6110 from a strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in Ontario.

Authors:  S T Howard; M T Oughton; A Haddad; W M Johnson
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01

5.  Histopathology and TB-PCR kit analysis in differentiating the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Xian-Ji Jin; Joon-Mee Kim; Hyung-Kil Kim; Lucia Kim; Suk-Jin Choi; In-Suh Park; Jee-Young Han; Young-Chae Chu; Ju-Young Song; Kye-Sook Kwon; Eun-Joo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Ribosomal PCR assay of excised intervertebral discs from patients undergoing single-level primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Todd F Alamin; Marcus Munoz; Alicia Zagel; Agnes Ith; Eugene Carragee; Ivan Cheng; Gaetano Scuderi; Indre Budvytiene; Niaz Banei
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Newer diagnostic modalities for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Rakesh Lodha; S K Kabra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Amplification of residual DNA sequences in sterile bronchoscopes leading to false-positive PCR results.

Authors:  K Kaul; S Luke; C McGurn; N Snowden; C Monti; W A Fry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR amplification with pan-Mycobacterium primers and hybridization to an M. tuberculosis-specific probe.

Authors:  V J Tevere; P L Hewitt; A Dare; P Hocknell; A Keen; J P Spadoro; K K Young
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens by strand displacement amplification of DNA.

Authors:  J A Down; M A O'Connell; M S Dey; A H Walters; D R Howard; M C Little; W E Keating; P Zwadyk; P D Haaland; D A McLaurin; G Cole
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.