Literature DB >> 8027344

Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system.

G E Pfyffer1, P Kissling, R Wirth, R Weber.   

Abstract

A total of 938 respiratory specimens (633 sputa, 249 bronchial and tracheal aspirates, and 56 bronchoalveolar lavages) from 589 patients were tested for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by the Gen-Probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (MTD), and the results were compared with those of the conventional methods of fluorescence microscopy and cultivation (solid and radiometric media). One series of specimens (n = 515) was decontaminated with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH: the other one (n = 423) was decontaminated with sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate (SDS)-NaOH. Of the specimens decontaminated with NALC, 39 were MTD and culture positive, 455 were MTD and culture negative, 18 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 3 were MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 96.2% for the MTD. Of the specimens decontaminated with SDS, 35 were MTD and culture positive, 372 were MTD and culture negative, 15 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 1 was MTD negative and culture positive, indicating a sensitivity of 97.2% and a specificity of 96.1% for the MTD. After resolution of discrepant results by review of the patients' clinical data, the sensitivity of the MTD was 93.9%, the specificity was 97.6%, the positive predictive value was 80.7%, and the negative predictive value was 99.3% for the NALC series; the corresponding values were 97.4, 96.9, 76.0, and 99.7%, respectively, for the SDS series. In conclusion, the MTD is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting M. tuberculosis complex within hours in both smear-positive and smear-negative respiratory specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027344      PMCID: PMC263163          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.918-923.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  S W Dooley; W R Jarvis; W J Martone; D E Snider
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples.

Authors:  A Brisson-Noël; B Gicquel; D Lecossier; V Lévy-Frébault; X Nassif; A J Hance
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Measurement of tuberculostearic acid in sputa, pleural effusions, and bronchial washings. A clinical evaluation for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  H Muranishi; M Nakashima; R Isobe; T Ando; N Shigematsu
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Diagnosis of tuberculosis by DNA amplification in clinical practice evaluation.

Authors:  A Brisson-Noel; C Aznar; C Chureau; S Nguyen; C Pierre; M Bartoli; R Bonete; G Pialoux; B Gicquel; G Garrigue
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA.

Authors:  V Jonas; M J Alden; J I Curry; K Kamisango; C A Knott; R Lankford; J M Wolfe; D F Moore
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K D Eisenach; M D Sifford; M D Cave; J H Bates; J T Crawford
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-11

7.  Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens.

Authors:  M A Morgan; C D Horstmeier; D R DeYoung; G D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Hospital outbreak of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. Factors in transmission to staff and HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  C Beck-Sagué; S W Dooley; M D Hutton; J Otten; A Breeden; J T Crawford; A E Pitchenik; C Woodley; G Cauthen; W R Jarvis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-09-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Tuberculosis: commentary on a reemergent killer.

Authors:  B R Bloom; C J Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of a segment of the gene coding for the 32-kilodalton protein.

Authors:  H Soini; M Skurnik; K Liippo; E Tala; M K Viljanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  52 in total

1.  Evaluation of three nucleic acid amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  S X Wang; L Tay
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a commercial ligase chain reaction kit (Abbott LCx) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens.

Authors:  E Tortoli; F Lavinia; M T Simonetti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Proficiency testing of clinical microbiology laboratories using modified decontamination procedures for detection of nontuberculous mycobacteria in sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients. The Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis Study Group.

Authors:  S Whittier; K Olivier; P Gilligan; M Knowles; P Della-Latta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnostic mycobacteriology: where are we today?

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens by a commercial polymerase chain reaction kit.

Authors:  F Stauffer; R Mutschlechner; P Hasenberger; S Stadlbauer; H Schinko
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Improved performance of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test when 500 instead of 50 microliters of decontaminated sediment is used.

Authors:  T Bodmer; E Möckl; K Mühlemann; L Matter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of nucleic acid in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis amplification tests.

Authors:  J Meador; D Moore; P Weismuller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-09

8.  New drug susceptibility test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the hybridization protection assay.

Authors:  J Miyamoto; H Koga; S Kohno; T Tashiro; K Hara
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of amplified Q beta replicase and PCR assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Q An; D Buxton; A Hendricks; L Robinson; J Shah; L Lu; M Vera-Garcia; W King; D M Olive
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Diagnostic performance of amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test with cerebrospinal fluid, other nonrespiratory, and respiratory specimens.

Authors:  G E Pfyffer; P Kissling; E M Jahn; H M Welscher; M Salfinger; R Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.