Literature DB >> 22395889

Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.

Carlos Gustavo De Moraes1, Shaban Demirel, Stuart K Gardiner, Jeffrey M Liebmann, George A Cioffi, Robert Ritch, Mae O Gordon, Michael A Kass.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal in this study was to compare rates of visual field (VF) change before and after the initiation of treatment in participants originally randomized to the observation arm of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).
METHODS: We included OHTS participants originally randomized to observation and excluded those who reached non-POAG endpoints. VF progression was determined using trend analysis. Global and localized rates of VF change were calculated based on linear regression over time of mean deviation (MD) and threshold sensitivity values for each test location. MD rates (MDR) and pointwise linear regression (PLR) analysis were also assessed using six VF tests before and after the initiation of treatment. A PLR endpoint was defined as a VF test location progressing faster than -0.5 dB/year at P < 0.01.
RESULTS: We included 780 eyes from 432 OHTS participants. Following the initiation of treatment, the mean MDR decreased from -0.23 ± 0.6 to -0.06 ± 0.5 dB/year (P < 0.01) and the number of VF locations reaching a PLR endpoint decreased from 2.13 ± 6.0 to 1.00 ± 4.0 (P < 0.01). The benefit of treatment was significant both among participants who did not convert (-0.17 ± 0.6 vs. -0.01 ± 0.5 dB/year, P < 0.01) and among those who converted to glaucoma (-0.51 ± 0.8 vs. -0.27 ± 0.7 dB/year, P < 0.01) based on the OHTS event-based endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of ocular hypotensive medication among OHTS participants originally randomized to observation significantly reduced the velocity of VF progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395889      PMCID: PMC3342789          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

1.  Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.

Authors:  J M Wild; I E Pacey; S A Hancock; I A Cunliffe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; David P Crabb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.

Authors:  P G Spry; A B Bates; C A Johnson; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

6.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kass; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Makoto Aihara; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  R K Parrish; S J Gedde; I U Scott; W J Feuer; J C Schiffman; C M Mangione; A Montenegro-Piniella
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11

10.  Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Paul Rhee; William J Feuer; John McSoley; Chris A Johnson; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09
View more
  26 in total

1.  The effect of trabeculectomy surgery on the central visual field in patients with glaucoma using microperimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Gokulan Ratnarajan; Jasleen K Jolly; Imran H Yusuf; John F Salmon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Why Do People (Still) Go Blind from Glaucoma?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Comparison of isolated-check visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma and high-risk ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Xiang-Wu Chen; Ying-Xi Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Series length used during trend analysis affects sensitivity to changes in progression rate in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Providing prescheduled appointments as a strategy for improving follow-up compliance after community-based glaucoma screening: results from an urban underserved population.

Authors:  Tavé van Zyl; Zhuo Su; Elaine Zhou; Ryan K Wong; Amir Mohsenin; Spencer Rogers; James C Tsai; Susan H Forster
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-02

6.  Efficacy and safety of high-dose ultrasound cyclo-plasty procedure in refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  He-Ting Liu; Qing Zhang; Zheng-Xuan Jiang; Yu-Xin Xu; Qian-Qian Wan; Li-Ming Tao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Measuring Rates of Visual Field Progression in Linear Versus Nonlinear Scales: Implications for Understanding the Relationship Between Baseline Damage and Target Rates of Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Kevin Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Bioactive lysophospholipids: role in regulation of aqueous humor outflow and intraocular pressure in the context of pathobiology and therapy of glaucoma.

Authors:  Ponugoti Vasantha Rao
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Evaluation of baseline structural factors for predicting glaucomatous visual-field progression using optical coherence tomography, scanning laser polarimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  M Sehi; N Bhardwaj; Y S Chung; D S Greenfield
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Seasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.