Literature DB >> 26486324

A review of consanguinity in Ireland--estimation of frequency and approaches to mitigate risks.

P Barrett.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Over half of marriages are consanguineous in some countries, and about 10 % of children worldwide have consanguineous parents. Perceived benefits of consanguineous marriage (CM) include preservation of tradition, stronger family ties, financial advantages, and bride protection. Potential harms include autosomal recessive disorders, complex congenital malformations, stillbirths, postnatal mortality. There have been no population-based data published on frequency of CM in Ireland since 1970.
METHODS: International prevalence figures and published estimates of CM were applied to 2011 Irish Census data to calculate the frequency of CM in at-risk groups. Searches of the published and grey literature were conducted to review evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks of CM and apply findings to the Irish context.
RESULTS: The estimated number of consanguineous couples has grown in subpopulations in Ireland in the past decade, particularly among Pakistanis (>967 couples), Nigerians (418-794 couples) and Indians (54-2099 couples). There are up to 3000 consanguineous couples in the Traveller community. Evidence for approaches to mitigate associated risks supports a three-stranded approach: family-centred genetics services, training and education of healthcare professionals (HCPs), community education programmes. DISCUSSION: Consanguineous couples desire accurate information for reproductive decisions, but may avoid hospital-based services due to language barriers, poor understanding, stigma. Uptake of genetic counselling and carrier testing is higher if a family-centred approach is provided, ideally through home visits in the couple's preferred language. Targeted education programmes enhance community awareness and have led to declines in CM elsewhere. Education of HCPs is necessary to clarify referral pathways, as many have exaggerated impressions of the genetic risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26486324     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1370-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  41 in total

1.  Haemoglobinopathy in Ireland: the changing face of Irish medicine.

Authors:  Corrina McMahon
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2003-01

2.  Genetic education and nongenetic health professionals: educational providers and curricula in Europe.

Authors:  Kirsty Challen; Hilary J Harris; Claire Julian-Reynier; Leo P Ten Kate; Ulf Kristoffersson; Irmgard Nippert; Jörg Schmidtke; Caroline Benjamin; Rodney Harris
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Communicating with patients when English is not their first language.

Authors:  J F A Murphy
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2006-09

4.  Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S Loader; P Caldwell; A Kozyra; J C Levenkron; C D Boehm; H H Kazazian; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Attitude of Saudi families affected with hemoglobinopathies towards prenatal screening and abortion and the influence of religious ruling (Fatwa).

Authors:  F S Alkuraya; R A Kilani
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  The frequency of consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis.

Authors:  A Darr; B Modell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Parental consanguinity as a cause for increased incidence of births defects in a study of 238,942 consecutive births.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; M P Roth; B Dott
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  1999

8.  "What is this genetics, anyway?" Understandings of genetics, illness causality and inheritance among British Pakistani users of genetic services.

Authors:  Alison Shaw; Jane A Hurst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Examining the family-centred approach to genetic testing and counselling among UK Pakistanis: a community perspective.

Authors:  A Darr; N Small; W I U Ahmad; K Atkin; P Corry; J Benson; R Morton; B Modell
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-10-21

10.  Challenges in the care for consanguineous couples: an exploratory interview study among general practitioners and midwives.

Authors:  Marieke E Teeuw; Anouk Hagelaar; Leo P ten Kate; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  Consanguineous Marriage and the Psychopathology of Progeny: A Population-wide Data Linkage Study.

Authors:  Aideen Maguire; Foteini Tseliou; Dermot O'Reilly
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 21.596

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.