Literature DB >> 8655796

Cues for discrimination of envelopes.

E A Strickland1, N F Viemeister.   

Abstract

Thresholds for detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at a signal modulation frequency were measured in the presence of a masker modulation frequency, with broadband noise carriers. Broad tuning for modulation frequency was observed. For maskers half or twice the signal frequency, thresholds depended on the relative phases of the signal and masker. These results were used to determine what aspects of envelopes listeners might be using in making decisions. Simulations were performed using an envelope detector model, consisting of bandpass filtering, half-wave rectification, and low-pass filtering. Decisions were based on envelope statistics that have been used to predict other data. These statistics were (1) rms power, (2) ratio of maximum to minimum amplitude (max/min), (3) crest factor, (4) fourth moment, and (5) average slope. The max/min statistic was successful at predicting the major trends in the data, without requiring the presence of channels tuned to modulation frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8655796     DOI: 10.1121/1.414962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward masking in the amplitude-modulation domain for tone carriers: psychophysical results and physiological correlates.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Paul C Nelson; Neal F Viemeister; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23

3.  Estimates of auditory filter phase response at and below characteristic frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Laurent Demany; Stephan D Ewert; Stanley Sheft; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Superposition of masking releases.

Authors:  Bastian Epp; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Discrimination of temporally asymmetric modulation with triangular envelopes on a broadband-noise carrier (L).

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.