Literature DB >> 15898657

Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators.

Christian Füllgrabe1, Brian C J Moore, Laurent Demany, Stephan D Ewert, Stanley Sheft, Christian Lorenzi.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that an auditory nonlinearity converts second-order sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) (i.e., modulation of SAM depth) into a first-order SAM component, which contributes to the perception of second-order SAM. However, conversion may also occur in other ways such as cochlear filtering. The present experiments explored the source of the first-order SAM component by investigating the ability to detect a 5-Hz, first-order SAM probe in the presence of a second-order SAM masker beating at the probe frequency. Detection performance was measured as a function of masker-carrier modulation frequency, phase relationship between the probe and masker modulator, and probe modulation depth. In experiment 1, the carrier was a 5-kHz sinusoid presented either alone or within a notched-noise masker in order to restrict off-frequency listening. In experiment 2, the carrier was a white noise. The data obtained in both carrier conditions are consistent with the existence of a modulation distortion component. However, the phase yielding poorest detection performance varied across experimental conditions between 0 degrees and 180 degrees, confirming that, in addition to nonlinear mechanisms, cochlear filtering and off-frequency listening play a role in second-order SAM perception. The estimated magnitude of the modulation distortion component ranges from 5%-12%.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898657      PMCID: PMC2708918          DOI: 10.1121/1.1861892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Modulation masking produced by beating modulators.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Jesko L Verhey; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of envelope beat cues in the detection and discrimination of second-order amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Stephan D Ewert; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Jérome Sibellas; Christian Füllgrabe; Stéphane Gallégo; Claude Fugain; Bernard Meyer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Estimation of the level and phase of the simple distortion tone the modulation domain.

Authors:  Aleksander Sek; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modulation detection interference with two-component masker modulators.

Authors:  S Sheft; W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  S P Bacon; N F Viemeister
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1985
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Cascaded Amplitude Modulations in Sound Texture Perception.

Authors:  Richard McWalter; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.