Literature DB >> 16938985

Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Paul C Nelson1, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

The ability of psychoacoustic models to predict listeners' performance depends on two key stages: preprocessing and the generation of a decision variable. The goal of the current study was to determine the perceptually relevant decision variables in masked amplitude-modulation detection tasks in which the modulation depth of the masker was systematically varied. Potential cues were made unreliable by roving the overall modulation depth from trial to trial or were reduced in salience by equalizing the envelope energy of the standard and target after the signal was added. Listeners' performance was significantly degraded in both paradigms compared to the baseline (fixed-level modulation masker) condition, which was similar to those used in previous studies of masking in the envelope-frequency domain. Although this observation was broadly consistent with a simple long-term envelope power-spectrum model, there were several aspects of the data that were not. For example, the steep rate of change in threshold with masker depth and the fact that an optimal amount of envelope noise could enhance performance were not predicted by decision variables calculated directly from the stimulus envelope. A physiologically based processing model suggested a realistic nonlinear mechanism that could give rise to these second-order features of the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938985      PMCID: PMC2572864          DOI: 10.1121/1.2213573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers.

Authors:  T Dau; J Verhey; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking.

Authors:  R P Derleth; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system?

Authors:  M Chatterjee; M E Robert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-06

4.  Discrimination of amplitude-modulation phase spectrum.

Authors:  C Lorenzi; F Berthommier; L Demany
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Addition of noise enhances neural synchrony to amplitude-modulated sounds in the frog's midbrain.

Authors:  N G Bibikov
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Stochastic resonance in psychophysics and in animal behavior.

Authors:  Lawrence M Ward; Alexander Neiman; Frank Moss
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Jesko L Verhey; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  P X Joris; C E Schreiner; A Rees
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.