Literature DB >> 2400221

Parental suspicion and identification of hearing impairment.

P M Watkin1, M Baldwin, S Laoide.   

Abstract

The contribution of parental suspicion in the original identification of a 16 year cohort of 171 children with varying degrees of hearing impairment who were screened and identified in childhood was studied. Only a quarter of the children with permanent hearing loss were identified as a result of parental concern. The presence of parental suspicion preceding the audiological diagnosis was also measured. Of the children with severe or profound deafness, the parents only suspected the presence of hearing loss in 44%. Parental suspicion was even lower for those with a mild or moderate permanent hearing loss, and for those with an otherwise symptomless conductive hearing loss caused by otitis media with effusion. Some parents did identify hearing impairment in their children, and parental suspicion should never be professionally disregarded. Most parents, however, experienced initial difficulty in recognising their children's hearing loss, even when the children were comparatively old. The study confirms the need to continue to identify deafness early by both parental vigilance and sensitive hearing screening programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2400221      PMCID: PMC1792472          DOI: 10.1136/adc.65.8.846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  8 in total

1.  The aetiology of congenital deafness and audiometric patterns.

Authors:  L FISCH
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1955-07       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Child health services in the community: making them work.

Authors:  A Macfarlane
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-07-26

3.  Screening for hearing loss in childhood: a study of national practice.

Authors:  S Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-30

4.  Identification, assessment, and management of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  F H Bess; T Klee; J L Culbertson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Childhood deafness in the European community.

Authors:  J A Martin; O Bentzen; J R Colley; D Hennebert; C Holm; S Iurato; G A de Jonge; O McCullen; M L Meyer; W J Moore; A Morgon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

6.  Diagnosis and rehabilitation of deaf newborns: part II.

Authors:  F B Simmons
Journal:  ASHA       Date:  1980-07

7.  A pilot study to detect hearing impairment in the young.

Authors:  A D Latham
Journal:  Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse       Date:  1980-09

8.  Incorporation of parental suspicions in screening infants' hearing.

Authors:  V Hitchings; M P Haggard
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1983-05
  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Initiators in processes leading to hearing loss identification in Finnish children.

Authors:  T I Marttila; J O Karikoski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Childhood deafness poses problems in developing countries.

Authors:  Bolajoko O Olusanya; Linda M Luxon; Sheila L Wirz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-26

3.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  [Hearing loss in infancy. Who first suspects it? A descriptive analysis?].

Authors:  C Kiese-Himmel; E Kruse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Assessment of deafmute patients: a study of ten years.

Authors:  Mangal Singh; S C Gupta; Alok Singla
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-03-31

6.  A practical screening model for hearing loss in Iranian school-aged children.

Authors:  Mozafar Sarafraz; Khashayar Ahmadi
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  What is the role of the distraction test of hearing?

Authors:  A Mott; A Emond
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle.

Authors:  S M Tucker; J Bhattacharya
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; G McEnery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.