Literature DB >> 1750760

Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn.

C R Kennedy1, L Kimm, D C Dees, P I Evans, M Hunter, S Lenton, R D Thornton.   

Abstract

The auditory function of 370 infants, drawn from both low and high risk groups, was tested before postnatal discharge using three tests: standard auditory brain stem responses (ABR), automated analysis of ABR, and automated analysis of evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE). All infants failing any neonatal test had further audiological evaluation. Follow up information was also available on those who passed neonatal tests. Automated OAE testing of both ears was quickest (median 12.5 minutes) and least invasive (no scalp electrodes). Bilateral failure rates (and upper 95% confidence limits) with a stimulus 35-36 dB above normal hearing threshold level (nHL) were 3.0% (4.6) with automated OAE, 3.2% (5.1) with ABR, and 2.7% (4.4) with automated ABR. Automated OAE was the test most sensitive for subsequently confirmed hearing impairment. Sequential testing with automated OAE followed, in those failing this test, by automated ABR would have provided a screening test for substantial hearing impairment with a specificity greater than 99% in this population. Possible application as a universal screen is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1750760      PMCID: PMC1590287          DOI: 10.1136/adc.66.10_spec_no.1124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  16 in total

1.  The effect of stimulus level on click evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem responses in neonates under intensive care.

Authors:  J C Stevens; H D Webb; M F Smith; J T Buffin
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-10

2.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  P Bonfils; A Dumont; P Marie; M Francois; P Narcy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.

Authors:  P E Scanlon; J M Bamford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Screening for sensorineural deafness by health visitors. The Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; H Ashurst
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Long term follow up of newborns tested with the auditory response cradle.

Authors:  J Bhattacharya; M J Bennett; S M Tucker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Childhood deafness in the European community.

Authors:  J A Martin; O Bentzen; J R Colley; D Hennebert; C Holm; S Iurato; G A de Jonge; O McCullen; M L Meyer; W J Moore; A Morgon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test.

Authors:  B McCormick
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1983-12

9.  Age at fitting of hearing aids and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  A Markides
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1986-05

Review 10.  Prognostic validity of auditory brainstem evoked response screening in newborn infants.

Authors:  A D Murray; E Javel; C S Watson
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  10 in total

1.  Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M Richardson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H L van Straaten; R Bholasingh; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital newborn hearing screening results and assessment of the patients.

Authors:  İstemi Han Çelik; Fuat Emre Canpolat; Gamze Demirel; Zeynep Eras; Veli Gençay Sungur; Barış Sarıer; Uğur Dilmen
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2014-06-01

5.  Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  P M Watkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Otoacoustic emissions as a screening test for hearing impairment in children.

Authors:  M P Richardson; T J Williamson; S W Lenton; M J Tarlow; P T Rudd
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Tuber cinereum diverticula in a 28-month-old with xq21 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Whitehead; Gilbert Vezina
Journal:  Case Rep Radiol       Date:  2014-07-13

9.  Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison R Mackey; Andrea M L Bussé; Valeria Del Vecchio; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Inger M Uhlén
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.567

10.  The follow-up results of newborn hearing screening of Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Research and Training Hospital.

Authors:  Serpil Ece Aras Öztürk; Selma Aktaş; Leman Tuba Karakurt; Ömer Necati Develioğlu; Zehra Murat; Fatma Çetinkaya; Seda Geylani Güleç
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.