Literature DB >> 8651311

Conclusion of LOD-score analysis for family data generated under two-locus models.

M H Dizier1, M C Babron, F Clerget-Darpoux.   

Abstract

The power to detect linkage by the LOD-score method is investigated here for diseases that depend on the effects of two genes. The classical strategy is, first, to detect a major-gene (MG) effect by segregation analysis and, second, to seek for linkage with genetic markers by the LOD-score method using the MG parameters. We already showed that segregation analysis can lead to evidence for a MG effect for many two-locus models, with the estimates of the MG parameters being very different from those of the two genes involved in the disease. We show here that use of these MG parameter estimates in the LOD-score analysis may lead to a failure to detect linkage for some two-locus models. For these models, use of the sib-pair method gives a non-negligible increase of power to detect linkage. The linkage-homogeneity test among subsamples differing for the familial disease distribution provides evidence of parameter misspecification, when the MG parameters are used. Moreover, for most of the models, use of the MG parameters in LOD-score analysis leads to a large bias in estimation of the recombination fraction and sometimes also to a rejection of linkage for the true recombination fraction. A final important point is that a strong evidence of an MG effect, obtained by segregation analysis, does not necessarily imply that linkage will be detected for at least one of the two genes, even with the true parameters and with a close informative marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8651311      PMCID: PMC1915060     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  13 in total

1.  Sequential tests for the detection of linkage.

Authors:  N E MORTON
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits.

Authors:  V J Vieland; S E Hodge; D A Greenberg
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Detection of linkage under heterogeneity: comparison of the two-locus vs. admixture models.

Authors:  L R Goldin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Disease susceptibility genes--their identification by multiple case family studies.

Authors:  N E Day; M J Simons
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  1976-08

5.  Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits.

Authors:  N E Morton; C J MacLean
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  A unified model for complex segregation analysis.

Authors:  J M Lalouel; D C Rao; N E Morton; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Analysis of family resemblance. IV. Operational characteristics of segregation analysis.

Authors:  C J MacLean; N E Morton; R Lew
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.

Authors:  B K Suarez; J Rice; T Reich
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  The affected sib pair IBD distribution for HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes.

Authors:  B K Suarez
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  1978-08
View more
  9 in total

1.  Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.

Authors:  P C Abreu; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A major gene model of adult height is suggested in Chinese.

Authors:  Miao-Xin Li; Peng-Yuan Liu; Yu-Mei Li; Yue-Juan Qin; Yao-Zhong Liu; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Computer simulation is an undervalued tool for genetic analysis: a historical view and presentation of SHIMSHON--a Web-based genetic simulation package.

Authors:  David A Greenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods.

Authors:  M Durner; V J Vieland; D A Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A follow-up report of a genome search for affective disorder predisposition loci in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  M C LaBuda; M Maldonado; D Marshall; K Otten; D S Gerhard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Modifier gene study of meconium ileus in cystic fibrosis: statistical considerations and gene mapping results.

Authors:  Ruslan Dorfman; Weili Li; Lei Sun; Fan Lin; Yongqian Wang; Andrew Sandford; Peter D Paré; Karen McKay; Hana Kayserova; Tereza Piskackova; Milan Macek; Kamila Czerska; Dorota Sands; Harm Tiddens; Sonia Margarit; Gabriela Repetto; Marci K Sontag; Frank J Accurso; Scott Blackman; Garry R Cutting; Lap-Chee Tsui; Mary Corey; Peter Durie; Julian Zielenski; Lisa J Strug
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Genetics of diabetic nephropathy in the Pima Indians.

Authors:  G Imperatore; W C Knowler; R G Nelson; R L Hanson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Genome scan for loci predisposing to anxiety disorders using a novel multivariate approach: strong evidence for a chromosome 4 risk locus.

Authors:  Belhassen Kaabi; Joel Gelernter; Scott W Woods; Andrew Goddard; Grier P Page; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A synergetic effect of BARD1 mutations on tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Wenjing Li; Xiaoyang Gu; Chunhong Liu; Yanyan Shi; Pan Wang; Na Zhang; Rui Wu; Liang Leng; Bingteng Xie; Chen Song; Mo Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.