Literature DB >> 1634107

Detection of linkage under heterogeneity: comparison of the two-locus vs. admixture models.

L R Goldin1.   

Abstract

Linkage analysis under the two-locus model and the admixture model was compared on pedigree data for a common disease stimulated under a model of genetic heterogeneity. The ascertainment of families was designed so that the samples had a large proportion of families segregating for both disease loci. The two-locus linkage analysis model did not demonstrate increased power of detecting linkage or more accurate estimates of the recombination fraction, theta than did the admixture model linkage analysis. When a sample was purposely chosen so that all of the families were segregating for both loci, then the two-locus lod score analysis was better. However, the increased power depended on assuming the correct gene frequency for the linked locus. It can be concluded that under the conditions of genetic heterogeneity examined here, testing for linkage under the admixture model is the preferred method of analysis. However, this is not a general conclusion that can apply to all two-locus disease models.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634107     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370090107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  18 in total

1.  A paradigm for finding genes for a complex human trait: polycystic ovary syndrome and follistatin.

Authors:  K Odunsi; K K Kidd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus-trait models: application to mite sensitization.

Authors:  K Strauch; R Fimmers; T Kurz; K A Deichmann; T F Wienker; M P Baur
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Susan E Hodge; Veronica J Vieland; David A Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Inter- and intrafamilial heterogeneity: effective sampling strategies and comparison of analysis methods.

Authors:  M Durner; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Significant linkage evidence for a predisposition gene for pelvic floor disorders on chromosome 9q21.

Authors:  Kristina Allen-Brady; Peggy A Norton; James M Farnham; Craig Teerlink; Lisa A Cannon-Albright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Conclusion of LOD-score analysis for family data generated under two-locus models.

Authors:  M H Dizier; M C Babron; F Clerget-Darpoux
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.

Authors:  C T Falk
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Confirmation of the HPCX prostate cancer predisposition locus in large Utah prostate cancer pedigrees.

Authors:  James M Farnham; Nicola J Camp; Jeff Swensen; Sean V Tavtigian; Lisa A Cannon Albright
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Genome-wide linkage using the Social Responsiveness Scale in Utah autism pedigrees.

Authors:  Hilary Coon; Michele E Villalobos; Reid J Robison; Nicola J Camp; Dale S Cannon; Kristina Allen-Brady; Judith S Miller; William M McMahon
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.509

10.  Genome-wide linkage analyses of two repetitive behavior phenotypes in Utah pedigrees with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Dale S Cannon; Hilary Coon; Judith S Miller; Reid J Robison; Michele E Villalobos; Natalie K Wahmhoff; Kristina Allen-Brady; William M McMahon
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 7.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.