Literature DB >> 8651127

Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect Fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise.

P Pianosi1, D Garros.   

Abstract

Electric bioimpedance has been used to measure cardiac output for decades. Improvements in modeling and microprocessor technology have spawned newer generations of such devices. This method would be especially useful in children, in whom the use of invasive methods is limited. We tested a device (ICG-M401, ASK Ltd.) in 30 healthy children at 2 levels of exercise (0.5 and 1.5 W/kg), and compared impedance measurements of cardiac output (QICG) with carbon dioxide (CO2) rebreathing measurements of cardiac output (QRB). The QICG-oxygen uptake (VO2) rel ation was expressed by QICG = 3.8 + 4.6 VO2; r(2) = 0.68. Mean +/- SD bias (QICG-QRB) was 0.14 +/- 1.05 L/min, not significantly different from zero (95% confidence interval -0.12 to +0.44 L/min). All QICG results were within +/- 15% of the hypothetical mean value (Bland and Altman analysis). The largest deviation of QICG from QRB was +30%, found in 1 of 57 paired determinations. Eighty percent of QICG values were within +/- 20% of the QRB result. We conclude that impedance cardiography with the ICG-M401 provided realistic and reliable estimates of cardiac output in healthy children during exercise. This, along with its ease of operation and utility at rest and during exercise, make it both useful and attractive for clinic and research purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8651127     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

1.  Hemodynamics during active and passive recovery from a single bout of supramaximal exercise.

Authors:  Antonio Crisafulli; Valentina Orrù; Franco Melis; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances.

Authors:  D E Warburton; M J Haykowsky; H A Quinney; D P Humen; K K Teo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Reliability of peak VO(2) and maximal cardiac output assessed using thoracic bioimpedance in children.

Authors:  Joanne Welsman; Katie Bywater; Colin Farr; Deborah Welford; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry.

Authors:  Stephan Schubert; Thomas Schmitz; Markus Weiss; Nicole Nagdyman; Michael Huebler; Vladimir Alexi-Meskishvili; Felix Berger; Brigitte Stiller
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Measurement of exercise cardiac output by thoracic impedance in healthy children.

Authors:  Paul T Pianosi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Sex-specific programming of cardiovascular physiology in children.

Authors:  Alexander Jones; Alessandro Beda; Clive Osmond; Keith M Godfrey; David M Simpson; David I W Phillips
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 29.983

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.